In this modern era, technology is a boon to everyone. It has definitely made the world a better place to live, making life more convenient and comfortable. However, some companies, along with the benefits, cause damage to the environment too. In my opinion, such industries should be fined with greater taxes than the ones not creating damage to the surroundings. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, some companies cause water pollution as well as air pollution due to which there are more chances to get hazardous diseases like Respiratory disorders. In addition, air pollution causes an increase in the global temperature as well. For instance, rubber factories, which sells rubber rolls to paper companies, use rubber to coat the rolls, the process of manufacturing the rolls causes a lot of free dust particles like silica in the air, which is harmful if inhaled. So, such companies should be asked to pay higher taxes. As a result, the revenue generated by the government can be used to add filters in the vicinities of such companies. For this reason, I believe that it is worthwhile to take greater taxes from certain factories.
Moreover, companies should be punished if not imbibing some strict rule. Rules will make them do things which will take care of the environmental pollution they cause, and not lead them just think about the profit of their companies. My own experience is a compelling example of this. As a doctor, the infected gloves, having blood on it and infected needles causes the land to get infected if not disposed off properly via the proper infection control measures recommended by the Medical Association of using different colored bins. On the other hand, it is profitable to the hospitals by just discarding it any which ways and not following the regulations. In such conditions, the license of the hospital should be canceled. To sum up, it's very important to make them follow the rules strictly else a legal action should be forced on them.
In conclusion, I strongly believe companies causing damage to the surroundings should be asked to pay the penalty or follow the strict rules because that's the way we can take the benefits of the products offered by the companies as well as not causing harm to the environment.
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 85
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 80
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage. Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty, such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage. Others said there are better ways to stop them 80
The SMOG index is a measure
The SMOG index is a measure of readability that estimates the years of education needed to understand a piece of writing. Lower smog index means the essay is easy to understand. It may need more difficult words or complex/compound sentences.
It is a not serious issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: BE_FINED_WITH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fine'?
Suggestion: fine
...n my opinion, such industries should be fined with greater taxes than the ones not cr...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...alty or follow the strict rules because thats the way we can take the benefits of the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91116751269 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7591073931 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55076142132 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4727534204 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.842105263 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57894736842 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221123226459 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631602623642 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569123660637 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141718569269 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546222611127 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.