People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why?
Recently, dangerous activities have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "is it advantageous or not?" Whereas it is a widely held view that the extreme sports are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sports standpoint, activity developments are bound up inextricably with health policies, which indicates they lead to both of critical progress and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and financial crisis as well as an exponential increase in amazing achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring boosting adrenaline is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of psychology science, without the slightest doubt, efficient physical activity systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to governmental interventions, harmful implications, and sports science institutions. A salient example of such attribution is a non-governmental organization, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take health improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had to opportunity to pinpoint reaction problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to risky, unsafe, and even finance. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for my self, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantage of risky activities is of more significance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | mehdi.mehdi2 | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples. 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of company. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- What is the best invention of last 100 years; the computer, antibiotics, airplane, and explainwhy? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...f that throughout this essay. From the sports standpoint, activity developments are b...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94718309859 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44531592817 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700704225352 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6073593071 50.4703680194 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.75 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0397528355046 0.242375264174 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0110974666402 0.0925447433944 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0138411500202 0.071462118173 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0236547899313 0.151781067708 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107621471436 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.5 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 9.94827586207 231% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.