Nowadays public loves TV shows seeking new talents, however, some people doubt if this way is right, or it is just the way how to entertain public. This essay will discuss both sides and provide examples. With the Internet and its social media, competition to succeed is harder than ever before and for many talented people, presentation of their talent in TV could be only way how to shine. Despite this, producers show also opposite side of talent to increase TV rating.
In the past, people adore magicians, singers, actress and other special individuals. This habit survives both world wars, global poverty and other disasters. However, the way to succeed in this era is more and more complicated as competition is enormous. Youtube, Instagram or Facebook releasing thousands of videos daily, but these talents are mostly forgotten after watching. Television shows such X-factor, Idol, Britain got talent are watched worldwide and produced many successful singers or magicians. It is obvious that without this chance their talent should be disappeared in thousands of viral videos online.
On the other hand, all these TV shows are way how to make a money and won't be successful without a high rating. People love talented people, but what they love more is individuals without talent. To entertain our society, producers mix talented and so-called “bad talented” people together as a way to increase the rating. It is shame, that these videos are actually more popular in the virtual world than shots presenting someone's talent.
To summarise, I believe, that way how we looking for a new talented people is right and giving an opportunity to be successful. From the history we know, that talent is accompanied with entertainment.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Eating a balanced diet is the most important factor for a healthy life. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic big cities. 78
- Some people believe that the radio is the best way to get news, while others believe that TV is better for this purpose. Discus both views and give your opinion 56
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London Olympic 2012 Games. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en after watching. Television shows such X-factor, Idol, Britain got talent are w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17957746479 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71384320686 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5307546792 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263274529224 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865573993636 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627499523511 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162830140015 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598057083542 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.