The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The supplied maps illustrate road changes in City Hospital between years 2007 and 2010.

In 2007, main access to City Hospital was from intersection of City Road and Hospital Road. Bus stops have been located east and west side along Hospital Rd. Hospital have been covered by staff and public car park, located South from the hospital.

In 2010 main developments have been made. For easier access to the hospital and newly builded bus station located South West from the hospital two roundabouts have been constructed on City Rd and Hospital Rd and Ring Road and Hospital Road. Parking slots have been divided to staff and public section. Car park previously used for both purposes located South have been transmitted to Staff only. New public car park have been builded North East from the City hospital.

To sum up, in three yers area around City hospital have changed by developing new Bus station with designated entry and exit from newly builded roundabouts. Also, hospitals employees and visitors have been provided with more parking slots in dedicated car parks.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...d west side along Hospital Rd. Hospital have been covered by staff and public car pa...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32958500427 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4947308843 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190013320625 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105718327837 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112479196099 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16112847213 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763650252051 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.