it is not a good thing to move to a new city or country because we will lose old friends.
Since the dawn of the human beings, migration to other areas has always been one of the main interests among people. Due to its paramount importance on different aspects of life, a heated debate exists over whether the advantages and disadvantages of this critical process. While some people believe that abandoning the homeland to another area is not a rational strategy because of the presence of the friends, some other people, including me, have an opposite viewpoint. I firmly believe that people should migrate to other regions; however, they might lose their friends. Not only do they progress in their field of interest, but also it will be possible to gain valuable experiences with moving to other areas. In what follows, the most outstanding reasons will be scrutinized in order to clarify the discussion.
The first aspect to point out is that, many remarkable opportunities may emerge for people in the other cities. There is no doubt that people will miss such opportunities if they stay in their homelands. However, they probably lost their friends during this procedure; it paves the way to be successful in their desired fields. For instance, consider a student who likes astronomy science. Since, this branch of science needs high technological equipment, it will be indispensable for him to move to countries that have such facilities. Had he stayed in a city without any research group related to astronomy, he would have missed the invaluable opportunity to trace his interests.
A furthermore significant point is that, the more visiting of different places, the more learning materials will be available to catch. Needless to say, people will be able to have valuable experiences in different locations. Based on my own personal experience, I had been working for three years as a maintenance engineer in power plants which is located in the north of Iran before I moved to the south of the country. Because of the wet climate of the north of Iran, I just had limited knowledge about the repair procedure of equipment in this area. When I changed my location, I learned how should I repair similar components is arid circumstances. In fact, it has been so far the most valuable experience that I have ever gained. Although, there was a long distance between me and my friends and I was often alone.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that people will gain many benefits by going to other cities or countries. Therefore, they should stick in their current place just because of the friends. This assertion is based on two main reasons. First, golden opportunities might exist in other areas. Furthermore, valuable knowledge will be obtainable in different sites. That is why I highly recommend to all to move the other countries once every 10 years in their lifetime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-26 | yiyangiliu | 90 | view |
- Playing sports teaches people more important lessons about life. 73
- TPO 33 71
- Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 1- help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics 2- help people who cannot afford to build 70
- in order to be successful a person must be open to new ideas and willing to change his or her mind 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following:Some people believe that video games could inspire young students interest and make their study more efficient rather than distract them and be a waste of time, so young students should be allowed to play video 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in brief, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0063559322 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80924134531 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565677966102 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9388443588 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.52 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.88 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144862284148 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375865318779 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365522276429 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926904268403 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322768567113 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.