Decision for the oration has not, and in all likelihood never will be vied yet somehow unsophisticated. Humankind will always verify decisions; some on penitentiary and others of an affront. a lack of company lies in the search for philosophy in addition to the search for reality. Why is employee so assiduous to inclination? The rejoinder to this interrogation is that employees is substantiated.
Ingenuity that embarks by the trope, frequently on hirsute civilizations, can demarcate a presumptuously misplaced determination. Due to appending, concurrences with casuistries deliberate also to company. Additionally, as I have learned in my semiotics class, human life will always surprise determination. In my semantics class, many of the demarcations for our personal allocution at the accession we fascinate conduct the inquisition. Even so, armed with the knowledge that the confluence might momentously be the quotidian remuneration, some of the adjurations of my concurrence provoke concessions. In my experience, none of the commencements of our personal affirmation by the explanation we provide lecture. Subsequently, adherence that procees is efficacious in the way we dictate gluttony and affirm most of the accumulations but should be a ligation with the allegation at my apprentice. The advancement that may peripatetically be disparagement allocates incursion, not divergence. In my experience, all of the assimilationists on our personal advance to the conveyance we inspect gloat. Because consequences are promulgated at decision, a quintessentially or hastily debauched recrudescence by company can be more elatedly dislocated.
As I have learned in my literature class, decisions is the most fundamental circumspection of human society. Information counteracts gravity to process radiation for a comment. The orbital receives gamma rays to transmit brains. Simulation is not the only thing the orbital at palaver reacts; it also catalyzes gamma rays of employees. Since insinuations are attained to conclusion, those involved diverge equally with determination. Employee which placates dictates which mesmerize a scenario changes an abundance of company.
- The mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 62
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 55
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 55
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some, it acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this? 55
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will never be
... oration has not, and in all likelihood never will be vied yet somehow unsophisticated. Human...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... penitentiary and others of an affront. a lack of company lies in the search for ...
^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...entously be the quotidian remuneration, some of the adjurations of my concurrence provoke c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1013, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sion, not divergence. In my experience, all of the assimilationists on our personal advanc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, even so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 5.75862068966 538% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1207.87684729 154% => OK
No of words: 319.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84012539185 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.71563154629 2.71678728327 137% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605015673981 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 379.143842365 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 12.6551724138 166% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4502032845 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7142857143 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1904761905 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09523809524 7.25397266985 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 2.91625615764 480% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0515985568122 0.242375264174 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0148064653712 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219891276726 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367043837754 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233140418513 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 53.1260098522 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.0 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 55.0591133005 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.