Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school?
Recently, the phenomenon of students' knowledge assessment by formal written examination and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that evaluating via non-oral rehearsals in schools is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that coursework and exams can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, breeding diligent students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that prosperity, as well as working hard at school, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of curriculum in the future social positions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both doing practices and being expert in exams apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of knowledge management, taking part in school activities might increase the consequences of literacy. Moreover, fundamental aspects of illiteracy are related to this reality that the demerits of lacking in knowledge pertain to poor academic backgrounds. A scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a weak education system is correlated negatively with the statistics of being jobless. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of evaluation analysis by taking school exams into account.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of assessment through written examination far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of taking tests prove the significance of prosperity, but also pinpoint the education system implications.
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of students kno...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70758122744 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23513244315 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649819494585 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6651514838 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187122280848 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591511087091 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644858475041 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102382451841 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035094711156 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.