A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
Childhood and teenage years is probably the only period in our lives when we do not have too many responsibilities and can spend time exploring the opportunities which lie ahead of us, participating in various activities and hopefully choosing the right career paths. As being introduced to a wide range of options is a key to a future career success, same national curriculum, which does not eliminate any of the subjects, is essential for the pre-college students to make the right choices. Whether they want to become physicists or artists, they should be encouraged to learn as much as they can about different subjects and careers.
First, it is certainly very rare when a teenager is confident about the career path he or she is likely to pursue. It is therefore crucial to avoid early specializations and try to cover a broader range of subjects, not necessarily at a very deep level. It may well be simple laziness when one says he does not want to to study Math and prefers playing football all day long, as it is hard to make conclusions about interests and passions without trying to understand the subject and making at least a minimal effort to succeed. Moreover, early specialization choices are likely to be impacted by children's parents rather than children themselves.
Second, well educated people in a modern society are expected to have a certain level of general knowledge, which allows them to manage their personal finance, be pro-active about using the newest technologies, be familiar with theatre, music, etc., and this is something the same national curriculum can definitely help with.
Some may argue that certain people know early enough what their passions and strengths are, and they are ready to make the right choices before entering the college. However, such early preferences should still not prevent them from being introduced to a broader national curriculum which meets the standards of the minimal school education required for each individual. They are welcome to take some extra-curricular activities and dedicate more time to the subjects they really like; it is certainly not a must to excel at all the subjects being introduced. So, specialization in fact is not eliminated with such a system, it may well be taking place given that some compulsory requirements are met.
To sum up, pre-college specializtions seem to be premature and unnecessary. Young individuals need to be introduced to a spectrum of arts and sciences in order to be able to make educated choices about their future roles in the society. By getting some basic knowledge in different spheres and exploring their options early in their lives, they are more likely to succeed in the future, therefore making same national curriculum a must for a well-functioning society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...laziness when one says he does not want to to study Math and prefers playing football...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... can definitely help with. Some may argue that certain people know early enough w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 509, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...they really like; it is certainly not a must to excel at all the subjects being introdu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, still, therefore, well, at least, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09586056645 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94994255658 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525054466231 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8339900217 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.933333333 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196898092658 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062487186899 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599119364012 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109018110779 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520424623332 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.