TPO 48 Integrated
The reading claims that frog species have reduced in recent years. It provides some solutions to solve the problem of declining frog's population. However, the lecture finds all the ideas dubious and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First, the reader states that pesticides are harmful for frogs. This chemical attacks nervous system of frogs and may cause breathing problems. Hence, prohibiting farmers from using detrimental materials is one way to reduce this extinction. On Contrast, the lecturer said that reducing the use of pesticides are not economical. There are competiters in those areas. It is needed to strict regulation and requires another area.
Secondly, the reading alleges that fungus causes thickening of frog's skin. Since frogs absorb water by their skin, this will cause dehydration. Antifungal medication which kill the fungus with heat can help in preventing the frog's die out. On the contrary, the lecture argues that there are some problem with this treatment. One of them is that the treatment should be applied on each frog. In other word, it is individual and requires capturing each frog. Moreover, they cannot control offspring and this treatment should be repeated again and again. It is so expensive and time consuming.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that threating of natural habitats of frogs is another reason of their extinction. If the lakes and marshes will be protected from excessive water, this problem would be solved. Conversely, the speaker states that this issue is not a big problem. the biggest problem is global warming. Protecting water would not help saving frogs. Global warming is the main reason of frog's extinction.
- TPO 10: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO 45 3
- TPO 40 Independent 3
- Determination of number of Mode shapes required for damage detection in single-span beams using wavelet transform 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
... the lecture argues that there are some problem with this treatment. One of them is tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
... offspring and this treatment should be repeated again and again. It is so expensive and time ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s that this issue is not a big problem. the biggest problem is global warming. Prot...
^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...arming. Protecting water would not help saving frogs. Global warming is the main reaso...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29259259259 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55701783178 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1294506838 49.2860985944 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.1304347826 110.228320801 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7391304348 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.34782608696 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428336884235 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114623753088 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885710149586 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239543421336 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456852270044 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.22 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.