As leisure activities such as reading books and watching TV play a vital role in the development of human imagination and languages skills, how to choose the correct meant is important to everyone. Some people believe that reading books is a much better way than watching TV. While from my perspective, I disagree this thought.
Firstly, TV programmes are more lovely, making children spend more time on these. It is clear to notice that children are always concentrating on children channels. These channels convey much useful information for their brains to absorb. TV channels provide all kinds of dazzling and attractive images such as wild animals, historic figures, famous statues and beautiful scenery, some of which could be naturally stored in their brains. And with the process of the incredible brain, they can collage some of the images to become an even more complex image and finally boost their imagination.
Secondly, TV programmes also supply visual contents to viewers. Language skills are always hard to learn because they require learners to imitate good samples. So the best way to imitate someone is from TV as most people have access to TV. Scientists have proved that visual memories can stay in our brain as long as possible through children’s research. By contrast, books are impossible to give readers continuous images which help readers to create visual memories.
Thirdly, the quality of TV programmes is no more boring and unhealthy as many people thought. No matter books or TV, they both are information media for viewers to connect the world. Dropping the previous judgment about TV is quite necessary. Many companies employ famous writers to help them to produce different types of TV projects, including almost all aspect of human life. Therefore, TV programmes are becoming more educational and informative.
In conclusion, watching TV is a better way to improve imagination and languages skills. May the sentence ‘Do not judge a book by its cover change to ‘ Do not judge the TV by our previous impression’.
- some people think that work is the most important thing of people s life Without the success of career life will become meaningless To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
- In some countries, parents expect their children to spend long time studying both in and after school and have less free time. What are the possitive and negative effects on children and society they live in 84
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Discuss both views and give your own opinions 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As leisure activities such as reading bo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erspective, I disagree this thought. Firstly, TV programmes are more lovely, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the incredible brain, they can collage some of the images to become an even more complex i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and finally boost their imagination. Secondly, TV programmes also supply visu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p readers to create visual memories. Thirdly, the quality of TV programmes is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng more educational and informative. In conclusion, watching TV is a better w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21492537313 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79548055208 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8924198355 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.35 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257951828787 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754791042501 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774459997275 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142529701404 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072417548697 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.