'The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement. "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes remain lower than those in neighboring towns. Moreover, Clearview's mayor promises many new programs to improve schools, streets, and public services. And best of all, retirees in Clearview can also expect excellent health care as they grow older, since the number of physicians in the area is far greater than the national average."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.'
The argument does present a tempting choice for those who are seeking a place to retire based on various premises. However, the argument is unconvincing as it is riddled with many unwarranted assumptions without citing proper evidence to bolster these assumptions.
The primary flaw in the argument is that the author assumes that the decreased costs in housing will be sufficient to attract many people who seek to retire. What if the cost may have decreased significantly from the last year but still is higher than neighboring areas? If the costs of housing are greater than neighboring areas or greater than the national average then the people will prefer to live in other areas and not be beguiled with the premise that there has been a reduction in prices. Hence, the author must present whether the housing costs are lower than other areas to make the argument sounder.
Moreover, the author makes another glaring assumption that more number of physicians imply a greater quality of health-care system. What if the medical care system ranks quite low in terms of proficiency and quality among the neighboring areas and the ratings of health care facilities are lower than nation’s average? Certainly, then the premise that the health care system is better than other places will be invalid and consequently will not attract people who want excellent health care facilities as they grow older. Hence, the author should present a competent analysis which can certify that the health care facility in Clearview as one of the best, if not the best, in the nation.
Additionally, the author assumes that the mayor’s promises of new schemes to improve schools, streets and public services will attract the people to reside in the Clearview. What if similar promises have been made in future but never been implemented? It could also be that the overall current state of schools and public services is in relatively bad state than the neighboring areas and the promises, if enacted will do little to match the state of schools and services in other cities. Then certainly, the people will not be beguiled by these tempting promises and thus Clearview won’t be a top choice for the people. Hence, the author should include evidence which can help to certify that the promises will be enacted and also present evidence to support the assumption that schools and services will be better than other cities to bolster the recommendation.
Further, the assumption that the spectacular natural beauty and consistent climate will be favorable by most of the people residing in Clearview. What if there is no benefit of the natural beauty and consistent climate? What if the people prefer some other aspect of cities? Hence, the author should present analysis that climate and natural beauty is preferred among most residents to determine the validity of argument.
To conclude, Clearview might prove to be a good destination for people seeking residence after retirement. But, due to various unwarranted assumptions and lack of evidence the recommendation is invalid.
- 'The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement. "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing cos 69
- The Human Mind Will Always Be Superior To Machines Because Machines Are Only Tools Of Human Minds. 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not exactly. retired people many not need schools, streets, and public services.
argument 4 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 503 350
No. of Characters: 2519 1500
No. of Different Words: 203 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.736 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.008 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.561 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 198 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 145 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.952 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.762 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.595 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2591.0 2260.96107784 115% => OK
No of words: 502.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16135458167 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68241497047 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424302788845 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.0 705.55239521 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0813509827 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.380952381 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9047619048 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170305893529 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599878695391 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616990914422 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945911661176 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331499953121 0.0628817314937 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.