crime
A large number of criminals who serve the first prison sentence, leave prison only to re-offend. While recidivism mainly occurs owing to the lack of rehabilitation and difficulties in finding regular employment once released, vocational training and close monitoring would be the solutions to deal with this issue.
Firstly, the reason for most of the first-time offenders committing crimes again, once they have served the punishment, is due to the lack of rehabilitation while they were in prison. In other words, offenders are not given an opportunity to retrain and learn new skills for their future jobs or develop a deeper understanding of correct moral behaviors for their reintegration. Instead, they mix with other perpetrators who are more likely to strengthen their criminal intentions. Secondly, repeat offending is due to the difficulties in finding employment after being released. As a result, many of them struggle financially which leads them back to crime, regardless of the consequences.
One way to tackle this is giving vocational training which helps law-breakers prepare for the life outside the prison. Indeed, this approach can enable them to learn useful skills for a job, which in turns gives them some means of supporting themselves financially. Moreover, recidivism would be ceased if there is more supervision as well as checks in place when criminals are back to society. As a result, this method would hopefully prevent them from taking any change to break the law again since they are being closely watched.
In conclusion, having vocation training and close observation when first-time offenders are free are effective methods in dealing with re-offending. If governments carry out these solutions, crime figures would soon drop.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 87 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-02 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | tata | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of criminals who serve the first prison se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43115942029 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96419108636 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61231884058 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9363772487 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101926840182 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439326633732 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818918625654 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684657985366 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684716664157 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.