One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is to see the decline of traditional learning. There is a widespread worry that increased traditional way of teaching will hardly serve the didactic purpose of education. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious consideration.
There is a number of arguments in favor of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that traditional education has specific subjects in place which students must pass to meet the criteria. In fact, not only do students has to focus on particular subject but they also fail to broaden their horizons and instil their knowledge. We can find overwhelming evidence to support the fact that there is a positive correlation between the number of students fail to obtain skilled employment and students who follow tradition learning style. Needless to say, all these demerits have a far-reaching impact on fulfilling student's needs.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that traditional learning style designs based on average students. Although Einstein was above than an average student, he hardly get opportunities to think out of the box. In other words, if Einstein was forced to study specific subject, he would not be able to discover scientific theories. For example,
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this impact on their reputation. 85
- do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 85
- Successful sportsstars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 75
- Is that law can change the human behaviour? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to style'
Suggestion: to style
... students who follow tradition learning style. Needless to say, all these demerits ha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...bove than an average student, he hardly get opportunities to think out of the box. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as for, as to, for example, in fact, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22488038278 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91647890873 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650717703349 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7447645773 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136136462269 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446308361502 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371158742254 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082459425386 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459988914973 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.