The line graph provided compares the arrivals of foreign tourists in five individual parts of the world over the period from 1990 to 2005.
According to the line graph, the international tourists come to North America for vacations the most while they hardly choose South America as their holiday destination. Moreover, the number of tourists who wants to go abroad for relaxation had been increased relatively between 1990 and 2005.
With regards to America continent, it is apparent from the data supplied that there is a contrast tendency between North and South America. Whereas tourists traveling to North America reached 70 million people in 1990 and remained stable after climbing up rapidly to 90 million. South America witnessed about 10 million tourists in 1990 and these numbers increased slowly before standing for over 15 million over the same period.
When it comes to three others parts of the world, we could see a sharp change in the number of tourists coming to Central and Eastern Europe for vacation, it had increased approximately 60 million clients over the fifteenth-year-period, from 30 million 1990 to about 90 million in 2005. Meanwhile, there were 20 million people chose Southeast Asia as there vacation's destination in 1990 and in 2005, these numbers accounted for 50 million customers. Although in 1990, Sub-saharan Africa was the least favorite place for tourist to come for holiday, they had attracted more than 9 million tourists coming for vacations in their countries contributing for around 19 million people in 2005.
- The bar chart below shows the number of miles travelled in a year by men and women for six different purposes in a particular country. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people claim that what people eat in many Western countries is unhealthy and that their diet is getting worse Critics say that these countries should change their diet What are your opinions on this 79
- The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2014, and future projection of 2025. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22709163347 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78079087529 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553784860558 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2206555557 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.777777778 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13572711623 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702178285867 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687790686396 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116401757243 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713444420898 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.