The bar chart is given information about how much time UK people spent on three types of telephone calls in the period between 1995 to 2000. The figures are measured by billion minutes.
Overall, the residents in UK spent most of their time on the local-fixed line call, while spent on mobile occupied the least time of UK people. However, apart from local fixed-line calls other two categories of phone call witnessed an upward trend throughout the given period.
To be more specific, local fixed-line call started at 70 billion minutes in 1995 with the steady increase it reached to the peak of 90 million in 1999 before it dropped to its initial figure in 2002. Additionally, as for other types of the phone call, national and international fixed line gradually rose from about 35 million to 60 billion in 1995 to 2002. On the other hand, the mobiles began at lower than 10 billion in 1995 and it doubled in 1999. After that, it dramatically grew to about 40 million in 2002.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some children nowadays take sports seriously while others play sports in their free time. Is this a positive or negative development?Give your own opinion and examples. 56
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the man features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 73
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, apart from, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6936416185 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48171501566 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2945066752 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196169118854 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863269117891 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455330252765 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140538410572 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438886837426 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.