Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
Education plays an important and most prominent role in building the life of an individual. It is this prominence that has made education take a high and respectable position in decision making during any stage of one’s life. The world today presents itself to be so unbiased that any decision made, either by instinct or by instruction, is let to be proved fruitful. It is at this stage that the impact of other factors or the extent to which they impact is to be reviewed.
Educational institutions imparting knowledge in any particular field of study will definitely carry the ability to analyze the likelihood of any student tasting success in the same. This is because the sole purpose of any institution would be to evaluate the depth of study of any student. Therefore, it becomes a moral responsibility of the institute to suggest if not mandate, the odds of pursuing any field of study.
On a practical scale, the institutions are to provide what has been asked for, irrespective of any outcome of an individual. The focus is on the group outcome for any institution and all the possible measures that can be taken in terms of improving the quality of education, required infrastructure or any other measures is on increasing the success rate and not fulfilling responsibilities which are more feasible from the students perspective.
Consider a field of study lasting a span of 4 years. It is highly unlikely that any institution can determine accurately the success rate of the students interested till the course is actually taken up. Any field of study has different views and projections to it and hence the selection of minor of that field or the mode of learning will also influence the students success. So it is impractical for educational institutions to carry the responsibility of dissuade students because the odds of these institutions being unsuccessful in determining ‘ success of students in any field ’ appears more.
On looking at various admission processes for education institutions, we come across different formats of tests that are taken up to determine the eligibility of students. This shows to an extent to which institutions play an indirect role in dissuading the students to continue further. It can be easily concluded that though educational institutions can act to dissuade students from taking up the field of study that they are not likely to succeed, it cannot be considered an executable responsibility and that the decision highly depends on students
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...lities which are more feasible from the students perspective. Consider a field of stu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ode of learning will also influence the students success. So it is impractical for educa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, if, look, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10628019324 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08900463533 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466183574879 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9856755289 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363314687755 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122318248928 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868699471592 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207120683974 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997312472399 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.