The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland
The table provides information regarding the hours of different spare time preferences in Someland by ages. Overall, TV watching was the most popular among all age groups, whereas cinema was the less preferred activity.
As can be clearly seen from the given information, teens spend 1200 hours per year watching TV/videos and it was followed by 70 aged people by a difference of 100 hours. The noticeable decrease recorded for watching hours with 300 hours from 20 to 30s, while it increased with the ages going up which reached to 700 hours. Furthermore, teens and 20 aged people are keen to socialize with more people and they spent 350 hours for this but starting from 30s figures saw a gradual decrease from 50 till 25 hours in the final year. In contrast to this elderly and middle-aged people preferred to be in contact with few people and spent over 200 hours; however, teens and 20s allotted their 150 hours per year.
People of 30s and 40s consumed 200 hours, whilst rest of the groups spent between 50 and 150 for individual exercises. Interestingly, group exercises followed a fairly similar pattern.
Cinema make up approximately 100 hours of teens, the older and 20s, even though it was under 50 hours for others.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Solving environmental problems should be the responsibilities of one international organization instead of state or national governments
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 89
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 81
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84360189573 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55279159096 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.828760137 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258088705308 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107967051071 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695434767034 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127710591645 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561728964689 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.