The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
The tables provide information regarding the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries in 1999 and 2004. Overall, it can be clearly seen that all the sales for coffee increased, whereas it dropped in some countries throughout five years.
With regards to coffee sales, in 1999 Switzerland had the highest sale amount which represented 3 million of euros and in 2004 it witnessed a double increase, similarly, it was followed by Denmark with 1.8 million with a rise to 2 million in 2004. Meanwhile, UK, Belgium and Sweden extended for 1.5, 1 and 0.8 million respectively. Moreover, figures for UK surged to 20 million and Belgium and Sweden showed a little growth to 1.7 and 1 million of euros relatively in 2004.
Turning to the sales of bananas, there was remarkable difference between the sales in UK compared with others. Furthermore, in UK it increased threefold from 15 million after five years gap to 47 million; however, Belgium almost halved from 1.8 to 1 million at the same time as Sweden saw reduction from 2 to 0.9 million respectively. In addition, there was a little difference between Denmark and Switzerland and both of them soared in 2004, reaching 5.5 and 4 million starting from 1 and 0.6 million of euros relatively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Solving environmental problems should be the responsibilities of one international organization instead of state or national governments
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 81
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94859813084 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92719247067 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8699761207 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.375 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227607099983 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140701109877 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.219982382284 0.0843802449381 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218082701967 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.21107858148 0.0819641961636 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.