Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer?
Getting information about something needs a context to learn about this, so studying as an implement can help students to better learn. Correct studying is a significant factor to get information that requires some elements such as condition, material, and how students are doing a study, students receive all data without any distractions and with a high efficiency. On the contrary, a controversial question raises in this issue how students should contribute to study? Some people prefer to study alone, but some people prefer to study with a group of students. I firmly subscribe the second notion and explain my reasons hereunder.
First and foremost, finding the best solution for every issue requires that people get all probable solutions and make a decision to choose one as the best solution. In other words, all students have different ideas about every question, but when negotiating together, they can get the best solution to solve question properly. Studying with a group of students gives an opportunity for them that with intercourse together can alter their wrong ideas. Also, some students have more knowledge than others can help weaker students to improve their quality study to get a decent grade in their exam. As the statistic standpoint of Asian education shows that learning courses with a group of students can get a better score than students are studying lonely in the same exam.
Secondly, doing every work needs a motivation persuade people to do this with high interests. When students who are studying with a group, their attempts encourage each other to study more. On the other hand, studying lonely is creating a condition that students are reluctant to study more because there are not any competitors that student sees their attempts to persuade the student to more study and get a better grade. For example, always I tried to study with my friends who made considerable efforts therefore incentive me to more study, and I got the best grade in the exams.
All in all, getting the best knowledge and a high score should study with our friends, as students not only can get the best solution with debating but also are encouraged to more efforts to get the best scores.
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many ne friends easily. 60
- The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities 60
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr.Krap, an anthropologist.Twenty year ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from observation that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dy to get a decent grade in their exam. As the statistic standpoint of Asian educa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, such as, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58813689112 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471544715447 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7747816559 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374252580469 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14923931437 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14572549252 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235634945043 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116218643133 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.