Preservation of wildlife is very important to maintain a healthy food chain. Global pollution through contamination of water and air could definitely one of the implications putting the wildlife at threat. But maintaining a pollution free environment doesn't necessarily result in the decrease of amphibian species. There could be several reasons for the drastic decrease in the amphibian species. One reason could be that the reproduction rate of the amphibian species has been decreased. When the decrease is identified the species should be marked as endangered or species that requires care. By doing so, special attention can be provided and the species could be saved from becoming extinct. Also, protecting the amphibian eggs will pave way for more amphibian species, thereby reducing their drastic decline. It is also important that we provide proper ambience as well as sufficient food for the species to grow. The contamination of water and air could be avoided by planting more trees and providing a clean water body for the amphibians to breed. Though the causes of amphibian species declines includes pollution and trout, there is way to protect the species and preventing them from their decline.
- In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park and the numbers of each species were drasti 37
- Two years ago the town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased new businesses have opened there and Ocean View s tax revenues have risen by 30 percent The best w 60
- Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and 54
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 50
- The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself 50
e-rater score report
flaws:
No. of Words: 193 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 193 350
No. of Characters: 1003 1500
No. of Different Words: 112 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.727 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.197 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.82 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 77 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.677 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.364 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.414 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.414 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.143 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aintaining a pollution free environment doesnt necessarily result in the decrease of a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 55.5748502994 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 2260.96107784 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 192.0 441.139720559 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30208333333 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.56307096286 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8380590186 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 204.123752495 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 705.55239521 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1769741358 57.8364921388 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5454545455 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192431717211 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828322870537 0.0743258471296 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582603734108 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192431717211 0.128457276422 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 98.500998004 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.