According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The argument states that in the past year, fewer people attended the Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year and it claims that this is caused by the lack of awareness about the good quality of their movies amongst the audience. But the decline in the number of people that attended the screening can't solely be attributed to this reason. What are the other factors that could be considered responsible for the low number? Probably the nation is undergoing a recession period or an epidemic, where a large number of people may want to avoid going to the theatres in order to save money or avoid infections. There could be other attributes contributing as well, like for instance, an offseason release. If the company released a children's movie during the exam season then they could be losing out on their most important demographic.
It also states that the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies increased in the past year. But this does not provide evidence about the number of movies that received positive feedback out of the total number of movies released. What about the remaining movies and their reviews? What if they weren't reviewed at all or were reviewed minorly? This could lead to an uneven statistic report on the reviews received by the company. Hence, it is important to understand what percentage of the total movies released were reviewed and determine the overall statistics.
The number of positive reviews increased when the number of viewers decreased. This cannot be a determinant of the success of the movies. What if the number of reviewers remained the same and the non-reviewer viewers decreased? For instance, if previously, 50 out of 200 viewers reviewed and gave positive feedback, then that percentage of positive reviews will be lower than when 50 out of 100 viewers review the movie this past year. Thus, the statement that despite the lower number of viewers, the greater number of positive reviews indicate success cannot be accepted unless the entire statistics are reviewed.
Thus, it is difficult to commensurate success with ambiguous statistics. For an increase in the budget for advertising, various factors need to prove that the issue is not the quality of the movies but the lack of awareness about them among the public. What if the major issue is the content of the movies? Then, even after enhancing the advertising budget and conducting marketing campaigns, success cannot be guaranteed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 68
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 413 350
No. of Characters: 2049 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.508 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.961 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.584 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 158 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.347 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.5 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...r of people that attended the screening cant solely be attributed to this reason. Wh...
^^^^
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... recession period or an epidemic, where a large number of people may want to avoid going to the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 715, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ike for instance, an offseason release. If the company released a childrens movie ...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... movies and their reviews? What if they werent reviewed at all or were reviewed minorl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 412.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08009708738 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66400385381 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458737864078 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9079549849 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.70786347227 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393934163983 0.218282227539 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12377484468 0.0743258471296 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139086910493 0.0701772020484 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235030450908 0.128457276422 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11691601607 0.0628817314937 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.