As per the report, the author is concerned with the decline in the population of the Artic deer lived on islands in Canada's Artic region. The author also states that the creature used to search from island to island over ice for food during the course of year. he also showed his concern about the report from local hunter regarding the declination in the number of artic deer possibly due to global warming.
In this argument the author mentioned that the artic deer used to travel from island to island and then he concerned about the report about the decrease in the count of the animal which he received from the local hunter. As the creature is migrating from island to island, the argument is not giving the clear idea of the region from the local hunters belong. There is a possibility that the dear might be situated on one island the report is taken on the another. There is no robust evidence about the region is presented that prove the diminishing in the number of deer.
The author has given information about the temperature requirement of the plant the deer feed on as well as the temperature cold enough to freeze the sea. However, there is no information provided about the temperature requirement of the creature in which it can survive. This inadequate information led us to an ambivalent data about the habitat.
Further more, the author is relying on the report from local hunter. But there is no rigid analysis provided about the cause of the decline in the population of deer. The cause might me hunting or migration; There is no proper evidence provided that give us the statistics about the accuracy of the report.
To support this, the author is colliding the local hunters' report with the global warming report to get the cause of the declination. But there is not valid facts or statistics supplied to detect the relationship between these two reports. The author is self-satisfying his statement that the cause in the decrease in the population of deer is because the sea ice is melted and due to which the deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea. Since, there is no powerful proof supplied and the author is concluding on his own, this conclusion looks less cogent to the eye of the reader.
In all, the argument is lacking sufficient information that cogently delineates the authors perspective. It is suggestive that the author should more focus on the analysis of the report before stating any rigid conclusion.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 39
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- Nearly 70% of employers blamed inadequate training for the shortfall in skilled workers, yet 70% of education-providers believe they suitably prepare graduates for the jobs market. Similarly, employers complain that less than half of the young whom they 63
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 430 350
No. of Characters: 2028 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.554 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.716 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.516 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.826 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.382 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.629 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.179 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...from island to island over ice for food during the course of year. he also showed his concern about ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ice for food during the course of year. he also showed his concern about the repor...
^^
Line 11, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nformation that cogently delineates the authors perspective. It is suggestive that the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, regarding, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 55.5748502994 128% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 430.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83720930233 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55750943614 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427906976744 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1094074331 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.473684211 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198300244412 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656616220956 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871290916543 0.0701772020484 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980482135867 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881435961062 0.0628817314937 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.