Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi

The author is suggesting in the argument that inoculation of cow flu cannot be permitted in a routinely administered manner. He claimed this suggestion on the basis of the assumption that there is a small possibility that a person would die as a result of the inoculations.

Firstly, the cause of the disease is not mentioned in the statement. There can be multiple factors that can result to a disease such as weather, food, water, and so on. Once the cause of the disease is known, it is helpful in finding the proper cure.
Thus, without knowing the root cause of cow flu, inoculation cannot be considered as the best remedy. Another fruitful information that can bolster the argument is about how much life threatening the flu is. The disease might not be as fatal as delineated by the author.

Furthermore, the argument lacking the information about the region in which the disease is spreading and the region where author is living. There is a possibility that the disease is endemic to a particular region that is far away from the reachability of the author's native place. This information, if provided, will help to know the bright side of the argument.

Finally, the author should provide the detailed data from where he got to know that inoculation of cow flu is harmful for people. There might be a possibility this statement is fallacious without even relating to the disease. There could be case in which a person might be died from inoculation but that is might be for another disease. A proper investigated information can cogently proved the author's perspective.

In conclusion, the author need to analyze the flu in depth before giving the suggestion. He should work to find the factors such as cause of the flu, areas affected by it, possible remedies for it and actual effects of the cure and so on, before drawing to a rigid conclusion

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is helpful in finding the proper cure. Thus, without knowing the root cause of ...
^^^
Line 6, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat is far away from the reachability of the authors native place. This informati...
^^
Line 8, column 385, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
...r investigated information can cogently proved the authors perspective. In conclusi...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 396, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ted information can cogently proved the authors perspective. In conclusion, the auth...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82554517134 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79794139387 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464174454829 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8858257279 57.8364921388 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1176470588 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276538761072 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088858101655 0.0743258471296 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664738564241 0.0701772020484 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146518143184 0.128457276422 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827757938608 0.0628817314937 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 98.500998004 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1502 1500
No. of Different Words: 143 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.679 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.731 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.882 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.286 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.35 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.573 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5