The authors statement says that there is a decrease in the population of the deer in the Canada’s Artic Region because of global warming which results in the melting of ice. However, this assumption is not cogent enough to come to a conclusion that the decrease of the deer population is based only on the reason mentioned above and the statement is a flawed one because of the following reasons.
Firstly, the author says that the deer move from one island to another in search of food. It wasn’t mentioned on which islands did the local hunters do hunting. May be the deer resided in an island where the hunters didn’t reach usually as the weather was very cold. May be the deer resided in one island because they found adequate food in that island instead of travelling. This might have made the local hunters believe that their population has reduced. The details on which islands the deer usually move wasn’t mentioned. Also, the deer would have separated and traveled to different islands and it might look like their population reduced. Another Reason might be increase in the number of hunters which would also result in the decline of deer.
The author hasn’t mentioned a strong evidence that the information given by the local hunters was correct. Global warming might affect the deer but the authors assumption is not based on research and just came to a conclusion as it coincides. One more reason would also be diseases in the deer. Some deer carry diseases that would spread in the group and affect them leading to death. The other possible circumstances which would dwindle the population of deer wasn’t mentioned. The author says that the deer were unable to follow the age-old migration patterns. The deer migration habits might have changed with time because they might have started searching for food in new islands as the food in the old islands wasn’t adequate.
Another reason for the decline of population would be their food habitat. Even though the deer traveled to different islands for food due to the change in climatic conditions, the plants died and the deer didn’t get the food they require to survive. This might have led to starvation and the population de-escalated. Additionally, it wasn’t mentioned about the islands that the hunters took in to consideration for hunting. May be there were many islands and the hunters use to hunt only in their local areas. The report wasn’t clear and statistics of the population was also not mentioned.
In sum, the authors claim was lacking evidence and the statistics of the population wasn’t mentioned. Also, the decrease of population due to global warming wasn’t backed by any further information. Further investigation is required to find out about the different islands in that area and even the habitat of the deer has to be studied before making a conclusion.
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertisin 54
- In order to produce successful original work, scholars and scientists must first study the successful work of others to learn what contributions remain to be made. 62
- The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten. - GRE Issue 28 83
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors statement says that there is a decrease...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...s did the local hunters do hunting. May be the deer resided in an island where the...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'reach'.
Suggestion: usually reach
...d in an island where the hunters didn’t reach usually as the weather was very cold. May be th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ually as the weather was very cold. May be the deer resided in one island because ...
^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...l warming might affect the deer but the authors assumption is not based on research and...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... follow the age-old migration patterns. The deer migration habits might have change...
^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'surviving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: surviving
...e deer didn’t get the food they require to survive. This might have led to starvation and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...there were many islands and the hunters use to hunt only in their local areas. The ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246601941748 0.25644967241 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.184466019417 0.15541462614 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0640776699029 0.0836205057962 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0407766990291 0.0520304965353 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0233009708738 0.0272364105082 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126213592233 0.125424944231 101% => OK
Participles: 0.052427184466 0.0416121511921 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56573585251 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.031067961165 0.026700313972 116% => OK
Particles: 0.00194174757282 0.001811407834 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.143689320388 0.113004496875 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0252427184466 0.0255425247493 99% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0135922330097 0.0127820249294 106% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2875.0 2731.13054187 105% => OK
No of words: 482.0 446.07635468 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96473029046 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.57801047555 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360995850622 0.378187486979 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284232365145 0.287650121315 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176348547718 0.208842608468 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101659751037 0.135150697306 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56573585251 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 207.018472906 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.383817427386 0.469332199767 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.8722248566 52.1807786196 82% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.039408867 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5384615385 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6347018456 57.7814097925 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.576923077 141.986410481 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.724660767414 53% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 46.961698053 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.7109375 1.8405768891 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461691446142 0.441005458295 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137275426912 0.135418324435 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106391207591 0.0829849096947 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.580413281724 0.58762219726 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12165735376 0.147661913831 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203154814644 0.193483328276 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693743145829 0.0970749176394 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.631521460464 0.42659136922 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0584241425739 0.0774707102158 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356632337853 0.312017818177 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322619745775 0.0698173142475 46% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.33743842365 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.82512315271 290% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.82389162562 354% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 14.657635468 136% => OK
---------------------
More arguments wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.