Argument
The writer of this letter suggests that the skateboarding should be banned in Central Plaza so as to return business in Central Plaza to as it was in the past. Even though the author of recommendation may seem reasonable, at the first glance, it rests on what might be less reliable premises or even unsubstantiated evidence to support his or her claim, and some vital questions need to be answered.
The arguments concludes on an unproven correlation that the increase in popularity of skateboarding has led to diminishing in the number of shoppers in Central Plaza. The write overlooks the fact that there may be various reasons had to do with the reduction of shoppers in Central Plaza. Economic situation for example can be a proper reason owing to the fact that given the nowadays' existing economic situation, many corporations have gone bankrupt, or perhaps a new luxurious mall providing a great deal of products has opened near the Central Plaza. Another reason that can contribute in reduction of shoppers in Central Plaza, is decreasing their sales due to their insufficient products or services.
Even assuming that vandalism and little have increased due to the increasing popularity of skateboarding, the writer of the letter fails to consider the fact that there is not any verified evidence indicating that the more vandalism increases in a city, the more the number of shoppers decrease there. In addition, increasing vandalism may be related to some flexible rules in the Plaza, Or new foreign immigrants bringing with themselves some problems.
The third problem with the argument is that the writers claims that the increasing popularity of skateboarding has led to reduction of shoppers in Central Plaza. This analogy is subjected to the question that whether increasing the popularity of skateboarding is associated with the location of Central Plaza or not. It is possible that the location of Central Plaza is not crowded, which gives residents a chance to utilize skateboard. Therefore,
All in all, examining all the angles and factors of the argument, the writer's recommendation cannot be taken to be correct on the grounds that it relies on a number of assumption each of which is dubious. The argument will not be cogent other than by removing some weaknesses mentioned above.
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to mange their own money at a young age. 73
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 76
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 80
- your city has decided to build a statue to honor a famous person in your country, who would you choose? 34
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rding should be banned in Central Plaza so as to return business in Central Plaza to as ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'conclude'.
Suggestion: conclude
...ons need to be answered. The arguments concludes on an unproven correlation that the inc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he number of shoppers in Central Plaza. The write overlooks the fact that there may be va...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, third, as to, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 378.0 441.139720559 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00952757685 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486772486772 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4157195736 57.8364921388 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.230769231 119.503703932 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0769230769 23.324526521 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.70786347227 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107793459841 0.218282227539 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05657985516 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868808279581 0.0701772020484 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726482451144 0.128457276422 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778660062463 0.0628817314937 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.