In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro

The argument made is that Prunty County should invest more on the safety of it highways since the reduction on the speed limit of the highways apparently didn’t have positive effects in avoid accidents. However, this argument should be better analyzed.

Firstly, the reasons why people still get involved in accidents and also exceeds new speed limit might be related to the fact that there is no proper amount of information to indicate speed limit on Prunty County’s highways. If these highways are mostly used by drivers how are not familiar with the region, they might not know speed limits in the region. In this sense, to change again speed limits or to invest in the safety of the road would not prevent accidents from drivers who are not well informed.

Secondly, the reports made by the highway patrol might be biased. The decrease in the speed limit might have had good results but highway patrol might had developed the report based in numbers in the rush time of the highway or in moments of the day where there is more possibility to accidents occurs. In this sense, the report would not be accurate since it would misrepresent the rest of the day or it will result in a data that has a focus in specific moments of traffic in the highway. In this sense, the changes in the policy made by Prunty County might be based in a fallacious argument.

Finally, Butler County example might not be good to serve as a paragon to Prunty County. Perhaps Prunty County already might have a safety standard in it highways similar to what Butler Country achieved to have in the recent years. In this sense, a decrease in the speed limit might be necessary to Prunty County because it might have other problems such as a more dangerous environment or geography in the areas that surround it highways. In this sense, to increase speed limit again might result in more problems than today’s problems.

In conclusion, one can say that the assumption the policy made by Butler County is not working should be better analyzed. In order to reinforce this statement it should be analyzed aspects such as: whether there is a good amount of information or not about the speed limit in these highways; how biased the report made by the police patrol might be; finally, it’s necessary to review if Butler County example might really serve as a paragon.

Votes
Average: 3.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...problems than today's problems. In conclusion, one can say that the assump...
^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... not working should be better analyzed. In order to reinforce this statement it sh...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.9520958084 170% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 410.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78292682927 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44456078957 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419512195122 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2624845038 57.8364921388 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 119.503703932 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.324526521 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.70786347227 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250977596839 0.218282227539 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106362041691 0.0743258471296 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417123027421 0.0701772020484 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16595361932 0.128457276422 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371480001029 0.0628817314937 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

argument 1 -- not OK

argument 2 -- not OK

argument 3 -- OK
----------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 411 350
No. of Characters: 1894 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.503 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.608 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.29 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.852 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.145 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5