There is a significant debate on the city council of Maple county, regarding ban on developing city towards existing farmland in the county. At the end, council has predicted that such ban will sginificantly increase housing prices in maple county, comparing examples of chestnut and pine county. However, there is dire need of further research regarding relation of such ban with increased housing prices for following reasons.
Firstly, the council fails to consider that rise in housing prices can have several reasons. Growth of city due to migration or natural process, development of suburbs around the city, inflation, income status of the city dwellers, industrial growth around the city can be some of the major factors. For instance, migration from nearby cities or villages can boom the demand for housing and hence inflate housing prices, while migration from the city to other cities can leave houses empty and decrease prices. In some extreme cases, houses can be available for free. Similarly, decreased birth rate in past decades can eventually decrease housing price significantly, sometimes rendering some housings free of cost in extreme case we had seen in Japan. However, the city council is deciding "ban on growth of city" as sole factor behind such growth of housing prices. City council should first answer the question "Is ban on city growth a single factor behind increased property price?" before reaching on conclusion.
Council had studied example of pine county, but still fails to consider that the rise in price of city is not so extreme. Rise of property value by 5-7% per annum can result in doubling of property value in fifteen years period. This is still less than inflation in most of the cities if compared. Further, pine county has banned development of new residential housing, even within the then range of city. Maple council's decision is planning to prevent expansion of city, while allowing new housings in previous range of city. thus, example of pine county does not seem to fit the current scenario. This should be considered.
Further, The example of chestnut county is overlooked. The city council fails to consider whether chestnut county is similar to maple county or not and the time frame of consideration also seems long enough to see viable results. Yes, there can be other reasons behind stagnation of property prices, but these should first be analyzed before decision. The city council is supposed to consider this example while deciding whether or not to ban growth of city.
In this way, the city council of maple city seems hasty in deciding not to ban growth of city in farmland. the council should analyzed abovemntioned points while deciding about ban of city growth outside current range based on the results of analysis.
- We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo company Since the adver 58
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting 66
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ndustrial growth around the city can be some of the major factors. For instance, migration ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...new housings in previous range of city. thus, example of pine county does not seem t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...to consider this example while deciding whether or not to ban growth of city. In this way, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... not to ban growth of city in farmland. the council should analyzed abovemntioned p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 458.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14192139738 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53874178578 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460698689956 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8164577722 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.391304348 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157361532307 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599681098225 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602923195292 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116098352776 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487578286127 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ndustrial growth around the city can be some of the major factors. For instance, migration ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...new housings in previous range of city. thus, example of pine county does not seem t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...to consider this example while deciding whether or not to ban growth of city. In this way, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... not to ban growth of city in farmland. the council should analyzed abovemntioned p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 458.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14192139738 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53874178578 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460698689956 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8164577722 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.391304348 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157361532307 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599681098225 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602923195292 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116098352776 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487578286127 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.