The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.
The council of the Maple County wants to restrict the overdevelopment of its county so that they can make the development of existing farmland in the County. But they are concerned that due to this the pricing of housing in the county will increase substantially. They are thinking that limiting the supply of new housing would lead to an increase in the price of housing in the county. This statement made by the council can be undermined, as the council must look up to the population of the county who are interested in buying the housing and should differentiate them with the people who are willing to develop their existing farmland.
The supporters of the council purported that Chestnut County who restricted the overdevelopment of the county and developed their existing farmland, their housing prices have not risen up to the mark. They have risen moderately. So they are proposing to apply same in the Maple County, but it can be possible that ten years ago the prices of the land in Chestnut County was not that high and it can be possible that the people of Chestnut County were more into farmland rather than developing the county. It can be possible that 10 years ago the Chestnut county’s people were not aware of those housing terms and that is the reason they never pitched in it and thus rates didn’t rise that much.
The opponents of the council allegedly stated that Pine County adopted the restriction of overdevelopment of its county and its housing prices have risen more than double. This statement stated by opponents is 15 years old statistics. In 15 years span lots of things changes and applying the same phenomenon in the present is somewhat difficult to digest. The county should evaluate the market pricing and should look at current statistics. The total evaluation of the market should be done before taking any ultimate step.
The council of Maple county can see the current statistics of the county that how many proportions of the people are into purchasing and selling the housing and the people interested in developing the existing farmland. The statements by proponents are opponents are understatements as they are putting forward the dilemma which is not of present scenario.
In the conclusion, the council should not make any decision merely on the basis of the statements purported by the opponents or proponents. The council should take a look at current statistics and should evaluate the total scenario before taking the final step of restrictions that would be implemented in the Maple county.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | samramjam12345 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 63 | view |
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 53
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 66
- high school should eliminate their art and music to make room for more extensive studies in mathematics and English. 80
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 58
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 23
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 430 350
No. of Characters: 2089 1500
No. of Different Words: 167 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.554 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.858 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.681 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.294 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.895 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.412 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.379 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.549 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.158 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...one before taking any ultimate step. The council of Maple county can see the cur...
^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed in developing the existing farmland. The statements by proponents are opponents ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 429.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98135198135 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77377720078 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.386946386946 0.468620217663 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5887364792 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.705882353 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35294117647 5.70786347227 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258905379638 0.218282227539 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873507972496 0.0743258471296 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796303793959 0.0701772020484 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155958121741 0.128457276422 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735707378992 0.0628817314937 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.