As people rely more and more on technology, their ability to think deteriorates
Technology is the essential part of human's life. Technology has increased at the great pace and is continuing to develop to make our life easier. The issue states that as people rely more and more on technology, their ability to think deteriorates this is not true. Technology brought remarkable changes in our life and which is very positive and which make human to progress in each and every field.
Humans spend more and more of his time using technology which has saved so much their time. The technology has made it easier for the humans to contact any person who is thousands of miles away within a second. Earlier the pigeon or the person use to send the letter to another person contact each other which was very difficult to communicate properly. But due to the email, we can send the message within a second to any person all over the world.
Earlier when there was no technology such as flights, ships, cars it was very difficult for the humans to travel from one place to another. They had to use either animal or have to walk to reach certain places. But due to advancement in the technology human can travel with ease. The issue states that technology deteriorates the ability of humans to think but in contrast to this I think technology opens the mind of humans to think even more and more. If a technology is developed then after that more and more invention takes place. For example, we can consider the example of smartphones, a gadget which can be useful for various purposes i.e making calls, messaging, camera, video and many more features. So at first, there were no such inventions, there was the normal phone from which one could call one another but technology made humans curious to discover more and more.
The women used to stay at home and take care of family and children and used to do daily chores. But due to technology now women can step out of their houses and work and support their family financially. The appliances such as refrigerator,vacuum-cleaner, dish-washer have made the lives of women easier and thus she can have an independent life. This implies that technology has a great impact on human and it has made lives of human worth living.
In the conclusion, want to summarize by saying that technology is boon for the human being. Technology has made it possible to think bigger and never to stop developing, there is always a new possibility and hope. Use of technology should be proper and should not be misused then only the human can achieve even more and surely it will not deteriorate the ability to think.
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 39
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- high school should eliminate their art and music to make room for more extensive studies in mathematics and English. 80
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 58
- As people rely more and more on technology, their ability to think deteriorates 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...econd. Earlier the pigeon or the person use to send the letter to another person co...
^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vacuum-cleaner
...lly. The appliances such as refrigerator,vacuum-cleaner, dish-washer have made the lives of wom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, thus, for example, i think, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71175166297 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68117807808 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467849223947 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7440464012 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5909090909 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278279914915 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943639636644 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175244446236 0.0758088955206 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163226714432 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960381712691 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.