The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.
The parliament concludes facing cost problems for people because of preventing building new houses in farmlands. The passage supports the idea by survey two countries, passing similar laws and delving their results. At first glance these statements seem to be strong enough to persuade us to accept the prediction, but when we start to revise the argument deeply we can find some flaws and unanswered questions which need to response.
To begin with, argument are speaking about three different countries and it has to mention all nuances in these countries. To put in the other hand, Maple country is totally different from Chestnut and Pine, Maple has own economy, resources also people with different culture and it isn’t true to compare with other areas without note this differences. It is crystal clear, regarding history will help to find solution but we need to consider all effects which influence on the prediction. Therefore, there is no reasonable response to answer this question, asked, why we are comparing three countries without considering their differences?
Furthermore, there is a problem in not discussing time which is one of the most important issues in analyzing and deciding. To be specific, passage mentioned Chestnut laws ten years ago and Pine rules fifteen years ago however didn’t speak about conditions were changing during this time. Surely, time influence on economy also costs and people ability to buy new buildings, maybe if these two countries now decide to pass this limitation laws, their problems would be reverberate. As a result, if the parliament had considered the time effects in its studies, the prediction would strengthen also more reasonable.
Without any shadow of doubt, just one evident wouldn’t lead to an especial result in investigating the research. To make clear, limitation laws aren’t solely the reason, leading to increase cost. It can depend on a lot of causes such as economy, the farmland chosen to prevent and zone suggested to make new houses. It is true that these kinds of laws can play the main role in changing costs but we need to perform the prediction from all aspects of matter. As a consequence, the parliament had spent more time to find effective factor in this topic before concluded the prediction about increasing costs.
In conclusion, the parliament proposal to increase costs in the country is flaw. Since the council didn’t speak about differences in all countries choosing to survey also ignore time issue in their analysis. In addition argument consider just limitation laws to predict increasing cost, however it can have another reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | samramjam12345 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 63 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 59
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 75
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favoriterecreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits,however, and the city park department devotes little 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 431 350
No. of Characters: 2148 1500
No. of Different Words: 226 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.556 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.984 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.625 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 158 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.684 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.034 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ignore time issue in their analysis. In addition argument consider just limitation laws ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, however it can have another reasons.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, as to, in addition, in conclusion, speaking about, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 16.3942115768 134% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 426.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23708920188 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77968866804 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 204.123752495 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4502386512 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.421052632 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4210526316 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42105263158 5.70786347227 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712355978676 0.218282227539 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234669320328 0.0743258471296 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028737102842 0.0701772020484 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424358640114 0.128457276422 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204572084368 0.0628817314937 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.