The argument makes a number of unstated assumptions regarding a new research approach that is claimed to be better than Dr. Karp's approach to study village cultures. Taken as a whole, the flawed assumption that will be detailed in the following paragraphs, if not proven to be true, seriously undermine the argument validity.
Fist of all, the argument fails in assuming that the children currently living in Tertian behave equal to those living in the island whe Dr. Karp made his research. By assuming this similarity without any evidence to support it, the author makes the argument weaken and hardly convincent. As the cultures and behaviors change in the time, there is no evidence proven that the diferences in the Dr. Karp's and the author's findings make the second reserach approach more accurate or trustful than the first one. Only if the author had shown evidences that the both surveyed public have similar behaviors, the argument could be considered as relevant to support the conclusions made by the author.
Secondly, the argument provide a unwarrent assumption that the survey conducted by the author was really representative of the children living in Tertia. By stating tha the reserach was made among island population, including Tertia, the argument raises doubts on how statiscally accurate and valid are the sampling plan used in the reserach to trustfuly represent the treats of ther tettia curlture. Indeed, the survey may be conducted with a very few sample of Tertia population and express more the culture of other island but Tertia. Therefore, the mentioned recent research conducted by the argument's author may not be useful to challenge the results found by Dr. Karp, what makes the argument misleading and unfair.
Finally, the argument presents too vague evidences that the interview-centered reseach method adopted by the author will establish a much more accurate undestanding of the child-rearing traditions of island cultures. There is no evidences or further detais on which aspects the new approach would be more accurate, as well as comparing against what research methods os studies this new approach will be better. This lack of information makes the argument doubtful and weaken the new research approach.
To sum up, the argument that the new research method to understand the culture of populations living in island is better than old one, conducted by the well-kknown antrophologist Dr. Karp, is totally based on flawed assumptions that, if not further detailed and proven, make the argument hardly relevant to any academic purpose.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 85
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 66
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 66
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Fist of all, the argument fails in assuming that the children currently living in Tertian behave equal to those living in the island whe Dr. Karp made his research.
Error: whe Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: By assuming this similarity without any evidence to support it, the author makes the argument weaken and hardly convincent.
Error: convincent Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: As the cultures and behaviors change in the time, there is no evidence proven that the diferences in the Dr. Karp's and the author's findings make the second reserach approach more accurate or trustful than the first one.
Error: diferences Suggestion: differences
Error: reserach Suggestion: research
Sentence: Secondly, the argument provide a unwarrent assumption that the survey conducted by the author was really representative of the children living in Tertia.
Error: unwarrent Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: By stating tha the reserach was made among island population, including Tertia, the argument raises doubts on how statiscally accurate and valid are the sampling plan used in the reserach to trustfuly represent the treats of ther tettia curlture.
Error: tettia Suggestion: test
Error: curlture Suggestion: culture
Error: tha Suggestion: than
Error: ther Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: reserach Suggestion: research
Error: statiscally Suggestion: statically
Error: trustfuly Suggestion: trustful
Sentence: Finally, the argument presents too vague evidences that the interview-centered reseach method adopted by the author will establish a much more accurate undestanding of the child-rearing traditions of island cultures.
Error: reseach Suggestion: research
Error: interview-centered Suggestion: interview centered
Error: child-rearing Suggestion: child rearing
Error: undestanding Suggestion: understanding
Sentence: There is no evidences or further detais on which aspects the new approach would be more accurate, as well as comparing against what research methods os studies this new approach will be better.
Error: os Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: detais Suggestion: detail
Sentence: To sum up, the argument that the new research method to understand the culture of populations living in island is better than old one, conducted by the well-kknown antrophologist Dr. Karp, is totally based on flawed assumptions that, if not further detailed and proven, make the argument hardly relevant to any academic purpose.
Error: well-kknown Suggestion: well known
Error: antrophologist Suggestion: anthropologist
----------------
argument 1 -- OK. need to mention the time: 20 years
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/story/gre-argument-essay-topic-21-outline
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 21 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 414 350
No. of Characters: 2129 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.511 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.143 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.76 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 181 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 128 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 104 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.14 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.416 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.643 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...thor. Secondly, the argument provide a unwarrent assumption that the survey co...
^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sample seems to be countable; consider using: 'few samples'.
Suggestion: few samples
...the survey may be conducted with a very few sample of Tertia population and express more t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue evidences that the interview-centered reseach method adopted by the author wil...
^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are no evidences'?
Suggestion: There are no evidences
...-rearing traditions of island cultures. There is no evidences or further detais on which aspects the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, really, regarding, second, secondly, therefore, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 414.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25845410628 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79918343414 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490338164251 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1666616201 57.8364921388 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 119.503703932 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 23.324526521 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.70786347227 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086349420089 0.218282227539 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038023641575 0.0743258471296 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314594135499 0.0701772020484 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532100027316 0.128457276422 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288434056692 0.0628817314937 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.3799401198 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 98.500998004 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.