The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a national newspaper Your recent article on corporate downsizing in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship o

In the argument, the author concludes that recent article on corporate downsizing is false. He ‎comes to this conclusion based on recent report, unemployment rate, and number of created jobs. ‎While the author’s assertion could prove true, he should provide three pieces of evidence in order ‎to bolster its credibility. ‎
First of all, the author needs provide evidence regarding the types of ex-employee’s occupations. ‎It is possible that most people were working in office, or non-industrial jobs which do not require ‎hard-work or skillful people. In this case, even by providing abundant job in industry, they remain ‎without job as they it is incompatible with their skills. Moreover, perhaps most of people who has ‎forced to leave their jobs were students. In this case, many students are not able to work in ‎industries which require years of experiences and knowledge. They were working in bar or ‎restaurant as it does not require most of the above criteria. Therefore, if above examples are true, ‎the author’s conclusion would considerably hamper.‎
Secondly, the author should provide more data about the way which recent survey was ‎conducted. It could be possible that the conductors were negligent, and did not take into account ‎many people who were suffering from lack of jobs. Furthermore, maybe many employees who ‎have lost their jobs, forced to leave the city in the hope of finding a suitable job. In this case, the ‎unemployment rate did not include them, which leads to unreliability of this survey. In addition, it ‎could be possible that most worker who lost their jobs were coming from adjacent cities, ‎subsequently, the conductors did not consider them as part of their statistic. If either scenario has ‎merit, the author’s assertion does not hold water.‎
Finally, the author should provide evidence regarding the ex-employee’s job conditions. It might ‎be possible that most of them had part-time job, as they are students or disabled persons, and ‎now they are undeployed as the market is full with full-time job. In addition, perhaps most of the ‎workers who lost their jobs, were heads of their department or were holding high position in their ‎previous careers. However, now most jobs pay above-average which is not proper for them due to ‎their lifestyle. In this case, they are not able to pay their expenses if they choose these kinds of ‎available jobs. Even maybe they feel sense of shame to do interview for these jobs as they were ‎prominent people such as CEO. Assuming either case is valid, the auth’s conclusion would fall ‎apart.‎
In conclusion, the author’s claim, as it stands now, is significantly flawed due to its reliance on ‎several unwarranted assumption. Hence, if the author would like to make the prompt more ‎persuasive, he should provide three pieces of evidence regarding above possibilities. ‎

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...ry, they remain ‎without job as they it is incompatible with their skills. Moreove...
^^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...le with their skills. Moreover, perhaps most of people who has ‎forced to leave their jobs wer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...In addition, it ‎could be possible that most worker who lost their jobs were coming from ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...ossible that most of them had part-time job, as they are students or disabled perso...
^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evidence regarding above possibilities. ‎
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 28.8173652695 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2479.0 2260.96107784 110% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30835117773 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98803836635 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496788008565 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5994625802 57.8364921388 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.681818182 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2272727273 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.70786347227 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094641199003 0.218282227539 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346637255052 0.0743258471296 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474118747618 0.0701772020484 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570249799392 0.128457276422 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352647657536 0.0628817314937 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 465 350
No. of Characters: 2293 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.644 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.931 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.603 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 155 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.299 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.303 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5