The following appeared in a memo from the new Vice President of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing.
"Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell very well: since we have not offered an alpaca overcoat for five years and since our major competitor no longer makes an alpaca overcoat, there will be pent-up customer demand. Also, since the price of most types of clothing has increased in each of past five years, customers should be willing to pay significantly higher prices for alpaca overcoats than they did five years ago, and our company profits will increase."
This memo from the Vice President of the men's manufacturing company concluded that purchasers will be eager to pay significantly more amount for alpaca overcoats than they did five years ago because the rates of a variety of clothing have increased in each of the past five years, this will help their company to fitch more profit. The author of the argument presents evidence to suggest this is valid including that they have a new fabric supplier and their number one competitor is no longer manufacturing an alpaca overcoat. Though the underlying issue may have merits, because of a lack of relevant evidence, unaddressed assumptions, and vague terminology the author's argument is unsubstantiated and deeply flawed.
The first reson offered is that the company has hired a new fabric supplier and now they are ready to begin the production of alpaca overcoat, according to the vice president of the company this a going to pave their way toward the profitable revenue. The question is does the new supplier has the same quality of material as compared to the earlier one? Will it provide the similar comfort as of previous once?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Anish Sapkota | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | hannahHD | 74 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | hannahHD | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | hannahHD | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities To what extent do you agree Use specific details and examples to explain your view 70
- People have different job expectations for jobs Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint 61
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- People have different job expectations for jobs Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint 61
- Some people participate in extra curricular activities such as volunteering in charitable events or joining dance groups to gain more knowledge and experience Others simply focus on their goals such as academic studies or work Which do you think helps in 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 665, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... assumptions, and vague terminology the authors argument is unsubstantiated and deeply ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'?
Suggestion: have
.... The question is does the new supplier has the same quality of material as compare...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 2260.96107784 42% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 190.0 441.139720559 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97368421053 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.56307096286 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75353713594 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 705.55239521 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 19.7664670659 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6361774716 57.8364921388 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 119.503703932 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 23.324526521 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.70786347227 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178314641592 0.218282227539 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072334573051 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671237647475 0.0701772020484 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138742105481 0.128457276422 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102841310023 0.0628817314937 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.3799401198 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.3550499002 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 98.500998004 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.