the following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news its former level."
The memorandum from the business manager of a television station states that their attempt to increase time to national news rather than weather or local news for over a past year gained bad reputation. Moreover as result of this they are loosing local business advertisements contracts. So to avoid further damage the news station is planning to restore weather and local news. The passage appears completely irrational and even it is carrying inherent weakness in it.
Firstly, the new station attempt to decrease weather and local news time and to increase national news time might be based on a coherent survey or it might be innovative attempt. In both the cases a persistent attempt to check complaints must be done without allowing the same program to run for a long period of over a year.
Secondly, the passage states that complaints received for the past year are numerous and are regarding coverage of weather and local news. Formerly it was stated that the new's station less time is given for both weather and local news, how could such short span news gained user attention. This even suggests the level of genuineness in the work of news station especially in weather and local news.
Thirdly, the local businesses advertisers are cancelling their contracts. The manager interpreted that the reduction in time of weather and local news as a reason for this. But if might be wrong because the station is experiencing lack of audience because of flaws in their reports of weather and local related issues not because of just increasing national news span.
Finally, the conclusion stands as a epitome for all blunders because already the news station is receiving complaints regarding the weather and local news reports.So by increasing the time span for those will even detriments the station's reputation. This even envisages the blunders with cluster clear clarity.
As I have stated all the flaws in the report, the manger must withdraw his report and must provide another one after a rational construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | mhayat29 | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | benson zhang | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | sea0215 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | madiha3 | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Mrunal47286 | 67 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- two approaches of personality building are compared 80
- To remain vigorous,any academic field needs to be led by truly independent thinkers who are willing to ignore established boundaries and challenge long-standing assumptions. 16
- unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise 50
- unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...over a past year gained bad reputation. Moreover as result of this they are loosing loca...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n. Finally, the conclusion stands as a epitome for all blunders because alread...
^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...ding the weather and local news reports.So by increasing the time span for those w...
^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
...span for those will even detriments the stations reputation. This even envisages the blu...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27808988764 0.25644967241 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.143258426966 0.15541462614 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0955056179775 0.0836205057962 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0477528089888 0.0520304965353 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0280898876404 0.0272364105082 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13202247191 0.125424944231 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0505617977528 0.0416121511921 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63036740821 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224719101124 0.026700313972 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.120786516854 0.113004496875 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0224719101124 0.0255425247493 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00280898876404 0.0127820249294 22% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2035.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 335.0 446.07635468 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07462686567 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364179104478 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316417910448 0.287650121315 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194029850746 0.208842608468 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101492537313 0.135150697306 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63036740821 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 207.018472906 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486567164179 0.469332199767 104% => OK
Word variations: 49.7758546071 52.1807786196 95% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3333333333 23.2022227129 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6060410557 57.7814097925 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 141.986410481 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.2022227129 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.724660767414 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 53.9751243781 51.9672348444 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.10256410256 1.8405768891 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473874439843 0.441005458295 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119826223017 0.135418324435 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.067260562437 0.0829849096947 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.647089687774 0.58762219726 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.193793631811 0.147661913831 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216122306596 0.193483328276 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986285953323 0.0970749176394 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371809397182 0.42659136922 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.088931809013 0.0774707102158 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304204539022 0.312017818177 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777175655507 0.0698173142475 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.