The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones In order to relieve Briggsville s notorious traffic congestion Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi million dollar subway system The subway will run through the major

Essay topics:

The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones.

"In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through the major downtown areas, a part of the town where buses serve as the only form of public transportation. For years, residents have been complaining both about inconsistent buses, and the general lack of safety while riding the buses. Additionally, the subway will be running twenty-four hours a day. Since motorists will spend less time in traffic, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones expects to see an immediate increase in worker productivity, which will improve the economy of Briggsville."

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

The argument above make some unwarranted assumptions. Unless the assumptions are answered the application of the strategy might not bring the desired implication rather complicate the overlal scenario. The intention of the mayor might be doing some good for the city but unless his decision is backed by evidence and more supported by unproved assumption the city's problems will not be addressed to thrive the city towards prosperity.

The first assumption it makes is that serving a part of the city with subway system will solve the traffic problem of the entire city. It is not even mention that the part where the mayor wants to build the subway is experiencing any problems at all. Before implementing the project one must have to assess the need to having a subway in the downtown area. Besides one the major assumption that the argument makes is that introducing subway will solve the porblem of the city whereas we did not even assess the root of the cause. Whether it is beacuse of the excessive number of commuters, or private vehicle or the behaviour of the poeple. For example if the demography of the area is more of a luxurious kind and people tendency is to commute by their owned vehicle then any additional public vehicle like subwya will bring no good tot he community. These salient features requires in depth study before taking any decision y the Mayor.

Ostensibly, it looks that having a subway in place of buses will solve the problem of traffic, but before coming to this very conclusion we need to know the number of bus services in that area and also the commute pattern of the people. It can be one of the case that the downtown might not need all day long service of subway and adding few amount of buses might also address the issue rasied by local people there. In that case having all day long subway will cause extra traffic with its movement and not to say the about the big chunk of money going after that for creating more chaos.

Even if all the above stated assumption holds true and buidling a subway is the correct decision to be taken by the Mayor there is no strict evidence that the economy of Briggsville is directly proportional to its workers' productivity at all. The economy of any state depends on a loads of factor and workers productivity might be one of them. But without having drawn a proper analogy we cannot define it as the only reason for the prosperity of the state.

At last it can be said that any progressive work incorporating money, work force and time need to have a justifiable reason through research and evidence supportin g it. Otherwise it would be total waste of all the resources. Having the above stated assumption prove unwarranted the Mayor's decision in building the subway might be perilous to the life of its citizen in place of propitious semblance.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-05 TiOluwani97 60 view
2023-03-11 Shubhan Mital 78 view
2022-04-14 harvey_elliot 73 view
2022-03-17 Ayamolowo 55 view
2022-02-19 ishi_jais 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Tabassum Zaman :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bove make some unwarranted assumptions. Unless the assumptions are answered the applic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ay is experiencing any problems at all. Before implementing the project one must have ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: TOT_HE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to the'?
Suggestion: to the
... vehicle like subwya will bring no good tot he community. These salient features requi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 876, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'require'.
Suggestion: require
...ot he community. These salient features requires in depth study before taking any decisi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r of bus services in that area and also the commute pattern of the people. It can be one of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...l day long service of subway and adding few amount of buses might also address the issue r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a load' or simply 'loads'?
Suggestion: a load; loads
...ll. The economy of any state depends on a loads of factor and workers productivity migh...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...h research and evidence supportin g it. Otherwise it would be total waste of all the reso...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, may, so, then, whereas, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 2260.96107784 104% => OK
No of words: 497.0 441.139720559 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71227364185 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52477972694 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470824949698 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3507024096 57.8364921388 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.263157895 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1578947368 23.324526521 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133767927418 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044410948491 0.0743258471296 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412898822423 0.0701772020484 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748207823097 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359099215351 0.0628817314937 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 497 350
No. of Characters: 2305 1500
No. of Different Words: 232 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.722 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.638 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.488 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.158 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.419 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.421 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.313 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.537 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.136 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5