The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:
“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The author have stated that the manned space flights are very costly and dangerous and also very risky for any man's or woman's life. He suggests that from the success of the unmanned satellites we were able gather too much useful information without risking the life of any man or woman.
The author have made an assumption that the scientists and the aeronautical engineers know everything about the space and exactly knew from the before where and how to fix the satellite in the space. But in reality, the astronauts who went in the space in the past by risking their life have gathered the useful information required and proving helpful for the present day scientists to make the necessary changes.
The author says that the unmanned space satellites are not dangerous at all, but there can be certain faults which can lead to explosions or failures and also waste of money. By sending manned space crafts the man can study above any certain planet and life on it personally after landing on it.
Unmanned space satellites can just gather the information that we receive through signals, but man can study the planet environment and chances of human survival then come to conclusions which can't happen in the case of unmanned satellite.
Investing only in unmanned space flight will stop expanding the R&D sector, and there won't be any research and new discoveries about the space revealed. So, it can be better to carry on both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Devendra Prasad Chalise | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Raunaq | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Adebayo | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | shreyas | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | christine_cui | 55 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- The best way to for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is instilling in them a sense of cooperation and not competition. 50
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinio 65
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 47
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the success of the unmanned satellites we were able gather too much useful info...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...survival then come to conclusions which cant happen in the case of unmanned satellit...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240458015267 0.25644967241 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.148854961832 0.15541462614 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.087786259542 0.0836205057962 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0534351145038 0.0520304965353 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0267175572519 0.0272364105082 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12213740458 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0458015267176 0.0416121511921 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46058223494 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0190839694656 0.026700313972 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125954198473 0.113004496875 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0267175572519 0.0255425247493 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190839694656 0.0127820249294 149% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1444.0 2731.13054187 53% => OK
No of words: 246.0 446.07635468 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86991869919 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.325203252033 0.378187486979 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.231707317073 0.287650121315 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162601626016 0.208842608468 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105691056911 0.135150697306 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46058223494 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 207.018472906 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.469332199767 117% => OK
Word variations: 53.2148923861 52.1807786196 102% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.039408867 45% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 27.3333333333 23.2022227129 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5533332889 57.7814097925 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.444444444 141.986410481 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.2022227129 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.724660767414 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 50.5040650407 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.78333333333 1.8405768891 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478676859055 0.441005458295 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166285798384 0.135418324435 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0882598946211 0.0829849096947 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.755943294072 0.58762219726 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161995222425 0.147661913831 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244213431744 0.193483328276 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990405689966 0.0970749176394 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.329826928149 0.42659136922 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0802552618567 0.0774707102158 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312822148736 0.312017818177 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508050903043 0.0698173142475 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.