Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
From the historic period to the modern day world, many of us believe that women are not capable of doing certain tasks that men can do as such working in the rigorous environment or else men cannot do certain tasks which women do like cooking, maintaining home properly. So the belief that men and women can do only certain tasks well is not always right as it is assumed by our ancestors.
Many of the modern day examples tell that inherent physical differences is not really a barrier in completing any task or achieving certain goals. In the past women never got a chance to go out and showcase their abilities to the others as they were forced to stay at home and do the daily chores of home and was never treated with respect. On the other hand men were treated with respect as the head of the family and the only person capable of taking important decisions about the family. This thinking has been changed by the people especially the women and young girls of 21st century by excelling in almost every possible field.
There are many women business entreprenuers and CEO's of major firms who have made it big and shown the world that they are also capable of handling difficult tasks and take important decisions. Even in sports, may it be olympics or national level sports women are doing good and making the full use of opportunity. Women have shown excellence in arts, architecture, engineering etc. On the other hand men also have started cooking etc
So, women have done well as men whenever they got a chance to show their skills, which they didn't get in the past. Although men and women have inherent physical differences they both have the capacity to do all the tasks equally and should not be underestimated by anyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-09 | Sharanya Patnaik | 58 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | saharako | 90 | view |
| 2018-07-22 | arushigupta11 | 50 | view |
| 2018-03-04 | Adarsh | 54 | view |
| 2017-12-23 | thembaguy | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 47
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss entreprenuers and CEOs of major firms who have made it big and shown the world...
^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...chance to show their skills, which they didnt get in the past. Although men and women...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'well', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.17987804878 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106707317073 0.0880659088768 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0609756097561 0.0497285424764 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0365853658537 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0701219512195 0.0406280797675 173% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41075779033 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0182926829268 0.030933414821 59% => OK
Particles: 0.0030487804878 0.0016655270985 183% => OK
Determiners: 0.0853658536585 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015243902439 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121951219512 0.0148568991511 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1735.0 2732.02544248 64% => OK
No of words: 309.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61488673139 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.281553398058 0.366273622748 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2071197411 0.280924506359 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132686084142 0.200843997647 66% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0711974110032 0.132149295362 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41075779033 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 219.290929204 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 56.2368981346 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0909090909 23.380412469 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4814432201 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.727272727 141.124799967 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 23.380412469 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 48.8028832009 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.6043956044 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417417247002 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.15545616395 0.123202303941 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0834396097738 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.611962414815 0.547984918172 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162256073042 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190624287143 0.161403998019 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061847039515 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.336453886267 0.385218514788 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0491879923502 0.0692045440612 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287516240181 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447998320109 0.0653680567796 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.