The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:
“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine the opinion provided was that the Manned space flight is costly and parlous than that compared to Unmanned space flights. The arguer also claim that the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has provided immense useful information which can be obtained without the risk of sending men or women in the space. In addition, have asked to invest the resources for unmanned space flight. But, there are some points that question the soundness of the recommendation made by the arguer.
At first sight, the arguer doesn't provide the justification that why the manned flight are costly. Moreover, he also asserts that the information can be obtained by the unmanned flight instead of taking the risk of sending men or women to the space. But, perhaps provide no clear evidence that could convince the reader. Nevertheless, it might be risky sending the human to the space but, it is also true that each and every information can't be obtained by unmanned flight such as the sustenance of human life on any other planet could have never been discovered. The arguer could have bolstered his opinion by providing the amount of resources and cost that is required for manned and unmanned space flight.
Nevertheless, it could be possible to obtain information by using space probes and satellite but, the arguer doesn't provide the information about how that could be obtained as the images can also be diminish and not clear. However, he could have provided proper evidence so that the investment could have been done for the resources of the unmanned space flight.
Hence, the arguer fails to justify the proper reason and proof for convincing the reader about how the unmanned flights are beneficial that the manned flight.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Devendra Prasad Chalise | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Raunaq | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Adebayo | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | shreyas | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | christine_cui | 55 | view |
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- Childhood is the happiest time of a person's life 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service. These organizations have a great need for volunteers, but in recent years, the number of teenage volunteers has significantly declined.Th 50
- Scholarship 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e arguer. At first sight, the arguer doesnt provide the justification that why the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...so true that each and every information cant be obtained by unmanned flight such as ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ce probes and satellite but, the arguer doesnt provide the information about how that ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239263803681 0.25644967241 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.165644171779 0.15541462614 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0920245398773 0.0836205057962 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0368098159509 0.0520304965353 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0184049079755 0.0272364105082 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113496932515 0.125424944231 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0674846625767 0.0416121511921 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53167798398 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021472392638 0.026700313972 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.138036809816 0.113004496875 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0337423312883 0.0255425247493 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0245398773006 0.0127820249294 192% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1812.0 2731.13054187 66% => OK
No of words: 303.0 446.07635468 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9801980198 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379537953795 0.378187486979 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250825082508 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171617161716 0.208842608468 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0825082508251 0.135150697306 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53167798398 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 207.018472906 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448844884488 0.469332199767 96% => OK
Word variations: 43.5479284389 52.1807786196 83% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 25.25 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3727269411 57.7814097925 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 141.986410481 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.724660767414 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 50.3325082508 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.90277777778 1.8405768891 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.584590582795 0.441005458295 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.158159623698 0.135418324435 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0657666339159 0.0829849096947 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.684030764015 0.58762219726 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152981667044 0.147661913831 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.314016741906 0.193483328276 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146464991253 0.0970749176394 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.598906809691 0.42659136922 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.131520754006 0.0774707102158 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.434642187973 0.312017818177 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156702333686 0.0698173142475 224% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.