It is recommended by the city manager that Bridge Bay should resume the contract with the Arko Trash collection company for the service of local garbage collection. The author recommended this based on the premises: the number of visits to the local beach has decreased significantly, and the Ocean Harbor, where the Arko is providing garbage collection, was experiencing unprecedentedly high attendance. However, two questions need to be answered before evaluating the argument and the recommendation that follows.
Are the conditions at Ocean Harbor roughly comparable to those at the Bridge Bay beach? It is possible that Bridge Bay beach is much larger than Ocean Harbor beach and hence needs more workforce than Ocean Harbor. Maybe, the visitors carry a lot of packed food to the beach because of the lenient rules employed at Bridge Bay beach, which allowed the visitors to litter more. Perhaps, the Arko Trash Collection might have done an even worse job managing the garbage there. If the above scenario is true, the recommendation that Bridge Bay resume the contract with Arko Trash Collection doesn’t hold water.
Even if the garbage collection is poor at Bridge bay beach, can the decrease in the attendance at Bridge Bay beach be attributed to the poor garbage collection there? Perhaps, the visitors are not really bothered by the amount of garbage accumulated there. Maybe they were upset with the kind of street food available there and chose to go to Ocean Harbor beach for better street food to enjoy while they stayed at the beach. It is also possible that Ocean Harbor had introduced some fun activities like motorboat riding, surfing, etc., which might have attracted the audience there instead of going to the Bridge Bay beach. If either of the above scenarios has merit, then the recommendation does little to no help to increase the audience at the Bridge Bay beach.
Even if the decline in the number of visitors can purely be ascribed to the poor garbage management by Satellite Waste Corporation, will the customers return to the beach even if the beach resumes its contract with Arko? It is likely that Bridge Bay beach had lost its reputation among the people, and its popularity had decreased over the months. Perhaps, the visitors were very annoyed by the poor garbage collection at Bridge Bay and were concerned about their health. If this is true, then the argument is significantly weakened.
In conclusion, the argument as it stands now is flawed due to various unwarranted assumptions. The above-mentioned questions need to be answered to thoroughly evaluate the recommendation that Bridge Bay should resume the contract with Arko Trash Collection.
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 50
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell Two years ago the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased new bu 50
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell Two years ago the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased new bu 60
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 390.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83975256119 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448717948718 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3309811159 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354428715719 0.218282227539 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11711545707 0.0743258471296 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844968573164 0.0701772020484 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216666014408 0.128457276422 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962563863426 0.0628817314937 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 390.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83975256119 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448717948718 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3309811159 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354428715719 0.218282227539 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11711545707 0.0743258471296 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844968573164 0.0701772020484 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216666014408 0.128457276422 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962563863426 0.0628817314937 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.