The argument claims that contracting with Satellite Waste Company instead of Arko Trash Collection led to reduce the number of visitors to the beach in Bridge Bay city. Stated in this way the argument fails to mentions several key factors, on the basis it could be evaluated. The argument's conclusion is based on presumption for which there is no conclusive evidence. As a result, the argument is weak, unconvincing, and riddled with errors.
First, the argument readily assumes that this issue is related to changing the company which was responsable for collection the waste garpage from the city to another company. This statement is stratch and not substantiated in any way. for inctance, the writer does not provide what the details in the new contract with the last company which may have some conditions to cleanning the beach. Moreover, the argument should give a notes for the other sides of the city because it may clean without any complaints. The argument could have been mch clearer if it explicitly stated the conditions of the contracts with the new company especially related to the beach.
Second, the argument claims that the new company has inadequate methods of collection the garpage. this is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between Arko and Satellite companies. For example, the argument does not added any information about the staff, instruments and capacity of machines of the new company in comparison with the old firm. If the argument had provided evidence with statistical numbers to compare both companies then the argument would have been more convincing.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the reasons mentioned above and thus unconvincing. It could be considerably strngthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts about the new contract. It is neccessary to have a completet of all contributing factors in order to evaluate the merits of a specific situation.
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another
- The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay Last year the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lower than the year be Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection a company that had 50
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska s North Slope a region that today experiences an extremely cold arctic climate One hundred million years ago when those dinosaurs were alive the environment of the North Slope wa 80
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h in Bridge Bay city. Stated in this way the argument fails to mentions several k...
^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...ated in this way the argument fails to mentions several key factors, on the basis it co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...on the basis it could be evaluated. The arguments conclusion is based on presumption for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ratch and not substantiated in any way. for inctance, the writer does not provide w...
^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a note' or simply 'notes'?
Suggestion: a note; notes
...ach. Moreover, the argument should give a notes for the other sides of the city because...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...uate methods of collection the garpage. this is again a very weak and unsupported cl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'add'
Suggestion: add
...ies. For example, the argument does not added any information about the staff, instru...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ompany in comparison with the old firm. If the argument had provided evidence with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 322.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17701863354 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84414576906 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5668642414 57.8364921388 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107064563474 0.218282227539 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384632206213 0.0743258471296 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557750529065 0.0701772020484 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680974807061 0.128457276422 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447573213009 0.0628817314937 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h in Bridge Bay city. Stated in this way the argument fails to mentions several k...
^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...ated in this way the argument fails to mentions several key factors, on the basis it co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...on the basis it could be evaluated. The arguments conclusion is based on presumption for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ratch and not substantiated in any way. for inctance, the writer does not provide w...
^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a note' or simply 'notes'?
Suggestion: a note; notes
...ach. Moreover, the argument should give a notes for the other sides of the city because...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...uate methods of collection the garpage. this is again a very weak and unsupported cl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'add'
Suggestion: add
...ies. For example, the argument does not added any information about the staff, instru...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ompany in comparison with the old firm. If the argument had provided evidence with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 322.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17701863354 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84414576906 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5668642414 57.8364921388 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107064563474 0.218282227539 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384632206213 0.0743258471296 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557750529065 0.0701772020484 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680974807061 0.128457276422 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447573213009 0.0628817314937 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.