The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a

Essay topics:

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.

“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public’s lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.”

Super Screen Movie Production Company(SSM) is interpreting the report incorrectly.
SSM only considering the percentage of positive reviews. But according to report only fewer watches SSM's movies. Let's say, year before that 100 people watched movies. Out of which 50 gave 5/5 and another 50 gave 4/5 average percentage would be 4.5. Now, last year only 50 watched and gave 5/5 so, average reviews will be 5. Yes increased but, actually no quality of reviews. What the actually number of reviewers?
Another assumption is that economic conditions of past years and report's year are same. Are they same? Country might be going through recession and people are being frugal.
More and more there might be other production houses producing great movies. The report needs to answer are there any other production houses? what are reviews of ther movies? Assume, someone who wants to watch a movie they will ask people who have already watched the film. Majority will suggest, 'other production houses are great'. With this chain reaction there will be drastic reduction in viewers of SSM's movies.

Votes
Average: 1.8 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 Sumaiya Mila 50 view
2020-01-06 Shams Tarek 46 view
2020-01-02 jamaya8 66 view
2019-12-26 Yongrok_Jeong 49 view
2019-12-10 Opak Pulu 16 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... interpreting the report incorrectly. SSM only considering the percentage of p...
^^^
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... report only fewer watches SSMs movies. Lets say, year before that 100 people watche...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...What the actually number of reviewers? Another assumption is that economic cond...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecession and people are being frugal. More and more there might be other produ...
^^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... are there any other production houses? what are reviews of ther movies? Assume, som...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 28.8173652695 17% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 55.5748502994 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 2260.96107784 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 441.139720559 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12921348315 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.56307096286 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40945749465 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 204.123752495 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.468620217663 131% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 705.55239521 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 11.0 22.8473053892 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1452619792 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.0625 119.503703932 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.125 23.324526521 48% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.0625 5.70786347227 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150978815888 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546963876103 0.0743258471296 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699803424819 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127057108885 0.128457276422 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933130274541 0.0628817314937 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.3799401198 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 48.3550499002 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.197005988 52% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.29 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 98.500998004 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.1389221557 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
No. of Words: 181 350
Minimum 250 words wanted

---------------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…

----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 181 350
No. of Characters: 885 1500
No. of Different Words: 110 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.668 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.89 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.447 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 45 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 11.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.34 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.519 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5