The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-Produced Movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen-Produced Movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly the contents of these reviews are not reaching of our propsective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with
Several factors make the premise for this argument to be faulty. Firstly, the fact that the percentage of positive reviews for Super Screen Movie Production Company increased does not mean that when the movie reaches more people they would enjoy it.
Also, the fact that there was a decline in viewership calls for a critical analysis of the major factors responsible for this decline in viewership, so that such factors could be addressed and the vieweship could increase again.
Going with the report from the marketing department, fewer people attended the movies, meaning that people found a better way of enjoying these movies without necessarily leaving their homes, and the fact that the positive reviews increased implies that research needs to be carried out on the possible factors responsible for this trend.
Another premise that is faulty in this argument is basing the drop in attendance to people's lack of awareness. The reason this argument is faulty is because if a lesser number of people were aware of the movies, then there wouldn't have been an increase in the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers.
Also nothing is said about the percentage of negative revies that the movies got.
Apart from this, the positive reviews received were only for some specifc movies, and not all Sper-Screen produced movies, hence one cannot reach a valid conclusion based on only a specified number without considering the whole picture.
Asides this, allocating a greater share of the company's budget to advertising does not necessarily translate into higher attendance as several newer channels of streaming videos are now available such as YouTube, NetFlix, etc.
In conclusion, if the company wants to gain more attendance, more research should be carried out on why people no longer watch their movies as much as in the preceding year, and also receive recommendations from the viewers on how they can do better to meet their movie needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | Eurus Psycho Version | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | riyarmy | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | Saket Choudhary | 68 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Tanvi Sanandiya | 55 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen Produced Movies than in any ot 65
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sesnse of cooperation not competition 54
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1609 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.012 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.534 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.225 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.399 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.888 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 8 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...le were aware of the movies, then there wouldnt have been an increase in the percentage...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...positive reviews by movie reviewers. Also nothing is said about the percentage of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, apart from, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 320.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57560672464 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.6157369997 57.8364921388 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.4 119.503703932 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 23.324526521 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.70786347227 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 5.15768463074 155% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20497971508 0.218282227539 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784052199636 0.0743258471296 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636538544221 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885942257444 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546709399842 0.0628817314937 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.3799401198 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.