The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot

In the memo by the advertising director, the director concludes that to they should allocate a more share of money to advertise the Super srcreen movies to increase awareness about quality of the movie. This prompt is based on the the assertion of positive reviews by the movie reviewers. However, these assumptions hold water when the following questions are answered.

Firstly, What if people have became more busy to take time out from their busy schedules to watch a movie? In other words, there could be possibility that due to over work and social responsibilities, people are not getting time to watch the movie. Also, there could be possibility that people nowadys rely on watching movies on online platforms, according to their time schedules after weeks or months. This could make less people attend to watch Super Screen Production movies. If any of these argument is true, it hampers the assumption made by the director.

Secondly, What if the content of the movies are only limited to certain age group? There could be possibility that the movies launched during that year would attract only certain age group and are limited to few people only. Perhaps, there can be a possible reason that due to some content, intending to focus on certain social or political aspects, which could hurt the sentiments of the certain people, therby making them not watch it. Also, ther could be a possibility that the artists selected are not liked by the people and. If these evidence is true, this could weaken the assumption made by the director.

Aditionally, What if the advertisement cause negative impact on the movie? It is possible that even more advertisement can negatively impact and not attract viewers to watch the movies. It is also possible that the a lot of money is spend on advertisement, thus affecting the quality of content and thus negatively affecting the reputation of the movies in the future. This could not only damage the reputation of the production company but also impact the life of people who worked in these movies. If any of these arguments hold the place, the assumption is strongly weakened.

In conclusion, as the statement holds, is flawed due to these underrated assumptions. If the advertising director provides the evidence to these arguments, then this assumption can be validated. Thus, the author needs to answer these question to strengthen the assumption made.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...y of the movie. This prompt is based on the the assertion of positive reviews by the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...y of the movie. This prompt is based on the the assertion of positive reviews by the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ered. Firstly, What if people have became more busy to take time out from their b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... after weeks or months. This could make less people attend to watch Super Screen Pro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...per Screen Production movies. If any of these argument is true, it hampers the assumption made...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... only certain age group and are limited to few people only. Perhaps, there can be ...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ch the movies. It is also possible that the a lot of money is spend on advertisement,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...lso possible that the a lot of money is spend on advertisement, thus affecting the qu...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 400.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.045 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71384874302 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4625 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.178166537 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0952380952 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190745383275 0.218282227539 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584869981732 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052043771743 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105654593516 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588368522061 0.0628817314937 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...y of the movie. This prompt is based on the the assertion of positive reviews by the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...y of the movie. This prompt is based on the the assertion of positive reviews by the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ered. Firstly, What if people have became more busy to take time out from their b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... after weeks or months. This could make less people attend to watch Super Screen Pro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...per Screen Production movies. If any of these argument is true, it hampers the assumption made...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... only certain age group and are limited to few people only. Perhaps, there can be ...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ch the movies. It is also possible that the a lot of money is spend on advertisement,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...lso possible that the a lot of money is spend on advertisement, thus affecting the qu...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 400.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.045 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71384874302 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4625 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.178166537 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0952380952 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190745383275 0.218282227539 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584869981732 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052043771743 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105654593516 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588368522061 0.0628817314937 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.