"A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. At present, the nearest jazz club is over 60 miles away from Monroe; thus, our proposed club, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. In addition, there is ample evidence of the popularity of jazz in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's jazz festival last summer, several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe, and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly.' Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment. We, therefore, predict that the C-Note cannot help but make money."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
The author of the argument purportedly highlights that people in Monroe City are really interested in the Jazz club and building a new club not only can attract majorities of people to the club but also can help accumulate a vast sum of money. However, the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which some critical, yet ignored question need to be addressed.
The first assumption that lacks some semblance of truth and can be overtly impugned is that the nearest jazz club is 60 miles far away from Monroe city. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since a question that might arise is whether people will stop going there for jazz club by erecting a new club in Monroe. One point that should be considered is that today with the development of transportation people easily and quickly long distances. So, there would be no difficulty commuting such a distance for the nearest club. It is also important to say that a new club might not be professional enough to appeal individuals as soon as possible. Indeed, the nearest club is working for many years and well-known artists are playing there. So, it might not be a wise decision to build a new club.
Furthermore, the author contends that there are many pieces of evidence represent that crowds of people are interested in jazz, listening radio program, attend festival annually and so forth. Although it might seem tenable at a face, it has some defects since you can always ask this question if these shreds of evidence can guarantee the success of the new club. One of the main, if not the only, problem with this premise is that the author does not show the exact statistic and information about people willing to attend the jazz club. Maybe many of them like to listen to radio jazz program and not to attend the club. Or maybe majorities of people prefer to attend a well-known jazz festival, not a new club in Monroe, who knows? Alongside that, although popular artists live in Monroe, there is a possibility that they do not prefer to join a new club in Monroe City.
Putting the two previous assumptions aside, there is still room for doubt. As set forth by the author based on a study, people spend at least 1000 dollars for jazz entertainment. Nevertheless, the rationale behind the premise could be challenged owing to an unsettled question if people will spend this amount of money on the new club in Monroe. One point that should not go unnoticed is that the author mentioned people are willing to spend this money on festival or entertainment. So, there is no guarantee people prefer to spend their money for Monroe's club. Or maybe people spend their money for learning jazz to play, not attend any place.
Having scrutinized all the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are a number of questions having been ignored by the author while the answer of which could add to the logic of each premise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | SIAN | 69 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | numan947 | 82 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | luzhang | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-19 | dhjhkjsahd | 66 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | juliettepeng | 83 | view |
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 60
- Some movies are serious. Other movies are designed to entertain. Which do you prefer? 73
- What are some important characteristics of co-worker? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 48 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 518 350
No. of Characters: 2375 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.771 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.585 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.456 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.522 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.924 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.652 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.515 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 611, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to jazz'
Suggestion: to jazz
...e people spend their money for learning jazz to play, not attend any place. Havi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, well, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 518.0 441.139720559 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70463320463 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51886710495 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453667953668 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2640287859 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.956521739 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5217391304 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.70786347227 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27281507119 0.218282227539 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909091569371 0.0743258471296 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654659169189 0.0701772020484 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157128367197 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828973402929 0.0628817314937 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.3550499002 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.