In the article, the author concludes that cleanall cleanser should be used in all industries by showing the data of cleanall in which it is removing 40 % more dirt and killing 30 % more bacteria compared to the next best cleanser in the market. According to the above statements, I would say that author hasn't provided complete data and situations on how and where it is being used.
In the first statement, the author says that cleanall is effective compared to other products in the market but hasn't mentioned how much quantity is being used at one time compared to others and also who are using it. There might be chances that more quantity is being used compared to other cleaners in the market. Maybe because of this reason its working effectively. The author hasn't mentioned the cost of cleanall which might be costlier compared to other cleansers in the market. In the above statement, author hasn't mentioned the type of industry where this cleanall is being used because it plays a major role in the comparison with other cleansers.
For example, there might be industries where dirt accumulates more frequently and also more bacteria are generated where cleaners might not be that effective.he hasn't mentioned that he is comparing in the same industry.
In the second point, the author says that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanall used far fewer sick leaves compared to the employees working in the buildings cleaned with other cleaners without giving complete data of employees who are using these cleansers. He hasn't mentioned the safety precautions that are taken by employees while using these cleansers which will play a very important role in this type of comparison.
For example, there is a case where the Industry has strict rules for employees while using cleansers in which the employee might have taken all precautions and safety measures upfront before using cleanall, where other employees industry is not that strict about using a cleanser which may affect their health more frequently.
By the above statements and examples, I conclude that the author has made a statement without considering all the factors and hasn't provided us the complete details while comparing the two different brands.
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have compla 60
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers CleanAll was found to remove 40 more dirt and kill 30 more bacteria than the next best cleanser Furthermore a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far fewer 58
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3,5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 375 350
No. of Characters: 1839 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.401 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.904 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.534 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.994 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.448 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.744 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.202 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ove statements, I would say that author hasnt provided complete data and situations o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s on how and where it is being used. In the first statement, the author says ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...red to other products in the market but hasnt mentioned how much quantity is being us...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...son its working effectively. The author hasnt mentioned the cost of cleanall which mi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... market. In the above statement, author hasnt mentioned the type of industry where th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the comparison with other cleansers. For example, there might be industries w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...cleaners might not be that effective.he hasnt mentioned that he is comparing in the s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...oyees who are using these cleansers. He hasnt mentioned the safety precautions that a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant role in this type of comparison. For example, there is a case where the I...
^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ront before using cleanall, where other employees industry is not that strict about using...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...without considering all the factors and hasnt provided us the complete details while ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 368.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11413043478 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57304678522 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413043478261 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 705.55239521 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6770826068 57.8364921388 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.833333333 119.503703932 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 23.324526521 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.70786347227 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297664696815 0.218282227539 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122028863673 0.0743258471296 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119607087949 0.0701772020484 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166415253024 0.128457276422 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956700920747 0.0628817314937 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.3799401198 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 12.3882235529 137% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.