Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight
The argument that we should not look to manned space flight as a viable method for space exploration and invest in unmaincorrect assumptions and will not remain cogent.
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture 46
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 86
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 53
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The argument that we should not look to manned space flight as a viable method for space exploration and invest in unmanned splace flight is based on flawed assumptions.
Error: splace Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Unless details regarding similar accomplishments are provided, we cannot say with assurance that the conlusion is warranted.
Error: conlusion Suggestion: confusion
---------------------
examples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-essays/following-opinion-was-provided-l…
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 410 350
No. of Characters: 2028 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.5 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.946 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.603 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 165 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.191 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.458 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n unmanned space flight costs the same. Also stated is the fact that it dangerous. H...
^^^^
Line 7, column 603, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ed or not, would be incapable of doing. Thus they would provide unique information w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, thus, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.6327345309 178% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06829268293 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6958182524 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431707317073 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5594778665 57.8364921388 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 23.324526521 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.70786347227 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395011144372 0.218282227539 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119449926833 0.0743258471296 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907530953312 0.0701772020484 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198399843409 0.128457276422 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761792983025 0.0628817314937 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.