Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight.
Argument claims that unmanned space flight is more cost effective as well as less dangerous. Author also asserts that resources spent in developing unmanned space program will yield better results Author supports this claim by providing a weak evidence that unmanned space mission gathered useful information just as successfully as a manned space mission. This argument, while sounds great, does not Provide any credible evidence to support it.
Firstly, it is reasonable to assume that space missions entails a huge amount of risk to the astronauts involved, author fails to provide statistical data. Author claims that unmanned missions will ultimately Cost fewer resources while gathering similar amount of data. However, author dose not provide any information regarding the cost of manned missions or unmanned missions. While asserting how much Of a resource saving advantages unmanned missions have, author should have provided hard numbers to support this claim. Author also claimed that danger to men and women working on these missions
Would be avoided all the while choosing to omit the facts explaining how dangerous a space mission actually is.
Secondly, author makes it clear that data gathered from the autonomous space flight is ‘useful’. While information being useful is completely subjective. author has not provided any study that confirms if the Quality of the information provided is as good as if not better than that of a manned mission. To support this argument author has to provide results of a study conducted specifically to review gathered information.
Moreover, programming robots to retrieve data might be a good application of the available technology but does not guaranty anything. Robots by definition are programmed to work within a given scope of Variables. expecting them to work adequately in an alien environment, which we don’t know quite about, is a display of arrogance.
To conclude, automation in space missions is a good idea and space agencies should work to develop the technology. To state that we should abandon manned missions completely and focus on unmanned
Is completely false.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 43
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 42
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-essays/following-opinion-was-provided-l…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 336 350
No. of Characters: 1765 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.281 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.253 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.697 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.196 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.371 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.624 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.136 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ous space flight is 'useful'. While information being useful is completely ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Author
... being useful is completely subjective. author has not provided any study that confirm...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has not provided any study that confirms if the Quality of the information provid...
^^
Line 6, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the information provided is as good as if not better than that of a manned miss...
^^
Line 8, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Expecting
...work within a given scope of Variables. expecting them to work adequately in an alien env...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issions completely and focus on unmanned Is completely false.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 335.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46567164179 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86241108039 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8515733864 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.705882353 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.70786347227 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225865473731 0.218282227539 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832677949598 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067142904278 0.0701772020484 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121449676015 0.128457276422 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707913029527 0.0628817314937 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.