Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The former argument states that people living in areas affected with cow flu infections should be inoculated whereas the latter states that since there is a small possibility that the inoculation might result in death, the inoculation should not be admistered regularly. Both of the arguments contain flaws and certain evidence is required to deal with the issues.
Firstly, the mortality rate for persons infected with cow flu is not considered, which is a serious flaw in the provided argument. If the mortality rate is considerably small or negligible, then it makes no sense to have any inoculation practices to begin with, as it is not prefered to consider routine inoculation, which might result in deaths, although few.
Secondly, the first argument states that "many lives might be saved" this might imply that there are considerable amount of mortalities due to the cow flu disease, it does not specify the region or area or the number of people infected, also, there is no quantification of mortality rate, which would be a very important factor in deciding wheather it would be feasbile to admisinter innoculations or not.
Assuming that the disease has high to very high mortality rat, it would be more appropriate to go with the second argument, i.e. to innoculate locals, where the cases of the cow flu are detected. Although it might result in some or few deaths initially, it might result in considerablely low mortality, if we consider all the cases of infections which might have resulted if we might have not innoculated the local population.
Also, it is obvious that, if the people wold know that there is a slight possibility that he/she might die as a result of the inoculation, the person might resist getting inoculated, this might lead to civil disharmony, thus awareness among people about pros and cons about getting inoculated is necessary.
We can also consider the concept of 'heard immunity', which states that if people, generally population surrounding locations which are epicenteres of such diseases, are immune to the disease (which is possible through inoculation), this might result in overall low transmission/infection rates for the disease, as the disease might not have host/carrier to carry the virus (cow flu) to the next host.
To conclude, I would say that there are many factors involved in deciding the right course of action in the given argument, the final decision should be tahen after taking suggestions or evaluation all possibilities involved to decide wheather to inoculate the locals or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 73
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 81
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 68
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 79
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 420 350
No. of Characters: 2077 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.527 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.945 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.745 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.576 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.42 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.831 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practices beginning'.
Suggestion: practices beginning
... makes no sense to have any inoculation practices to begin with, as it is not prefered to consider...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...might imply that there are considerable amount of mortalities due to the cow flu disea...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 339, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'hosted'.
Suggestion: hosted
... disease, as the disease might not have host/carrier to carry the virus cow flu to t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, whereas, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 417.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16786570743 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97024640254 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491606714628 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.8473053892 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.5610578048 57.8364921388 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 215.5 119.503703932 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.7 23.324526521 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.70786347227 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343795085711 0.218282227539 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135042135544 0.0743258471296 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825702930682 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165351545596 0.128457276422 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536708966359 0.0628817314937 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 14.3799401198 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 48.3550499002 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.1628742515 204% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.197005988 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 12.3882235529 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.1389221557 165% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.9071856287 202% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.