Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument presented seeks to sanction the routine administration of inoculations because of the small possibility of death that exists when the inoculation is routinely administered. To strengthen this argument evidence must be presented to prove that there are alternatives that are not just safer but also as effective as the routine administration inoculations, one would also have to ascertain if the inoculations could be administered in a way that is less routine and safer and also possess an even smaller possibility of death or even no deaths at all. Even if alternatives to the inoculations are provided, there would have to be proof to show that such alternatives are not pernicious those its being administered to and that the externalities caused by the execution of such alternatives pale in comparison to the small possibility of death as a result of the inoculation.
Another assumption that the arguments holds is that many lives may be saved if the inoculations are administered routinely, going by the first statement. One could infer from this statement that people are either dying in large numbers or theres a threat of many lives being lost in the current status quo. Therefore this becomes a case of cost vs benefits, if no other alternative has been provided against the cow flu then the argument is severly weakened as the only option would then be to allow many more lives die as a result of the small probability of death. Even if it is proven that a small number of people die as a result of the innoculations one would also have to consider the opportunity cost of not doing anything at all, as the probability of dyimng without the inoculations is significantly higher. However, before assuming this possition evidence would have to be provided to ascertain the chances of death without the innoculations, if indeed many lives will be lost witghout the inoculations than the argument is weakened.
One would oalso have to look into the efficacy of the inoculaytions would many lives be saved if indeed the inoculations were routinely administered to all, the potency of the inoculations to kick against cow flu would have to be presented as well as evidnece showing how such process has led to favourable outcomes in the past and how it may lead to similar outcomes moving forward.Furthermore, as a results of the deaths or the likely deaths caused by this flu, the argument does not adequately justify the choice not to permit the inoculations, as this is a situation where lives are or will be lost, a position of doing nothing at all cannot be taken. There has to be either evidence signalling a better solution to the quandary or one that brings more assurance that such areas may be eradicated or the disease in one way or the other would be eradicated. the recommendation given is one that is not progressive and poorly justified given the gravity of the issue at hand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...le are either dying in large numbers or theres a threat of many lives being lost in th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s being lost in the current status quo. Therefore this becomes a case of cost vs benefits...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ity of death. Even if it is proven that a small number of people die as a result of the innoculat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...lead to similar outcomes moving forward.Furthermore, as a results of the deaths or the like...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...outcomes moving forward.Furthermore, as a results of the deaths or the likely deaths caus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 862, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e way or the other would be eradicated. the recommendation given is one that is not...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.6327345309 178% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 495.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08015293581 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412121212121 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 812.7 705.55239521 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.8473053892 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 143.681638434 57.8364921388 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.090909091 119.503703932 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.0 23.324526521 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 5.70786347227 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349368964645 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143468762879 0.0743258471296 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696449517164 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248853804072 0.128457276422 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336456704919 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 14.3799401198 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.3550499002 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.1628742515 204% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 12.197005988 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.97 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 12.3882235529 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 11.1389221557 180% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.9071856287 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...le are either dying in large numbers or theres a threat of many lives being lost in th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s being lost in the current status quo. Therefore this becomes a case of cost vs benefits...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ity of death. Even if it is proven that a small number of people die as a result of the innoculat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...lead to similar outcomes moving forward.Furthermore, as a results of the deaths or the like...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...outcomes moving forward.Furthermore, as a results of the deaths or the likely deaths caus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 862, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e way or the other would be eradicated. the recommendation given is one that is not...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.6327345309 178% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 495.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08015293581 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412121212121 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 812.7 705.55239521 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.8473053892 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 143.681638434 57.8364921388 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.090909091 119.503703932 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.0 23.324526521 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 5.70786347227 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349368964645 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143468762879 0.0743258471296 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696449517164 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248853804072 0.128457276422 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336456704919 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 14.3799401198 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.3550499002 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.1628742515 204% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 12.197005988 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.97 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 12.3882235529 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 11.1389221557 180% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.9071856287 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.