Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The given argument consists of many flaws and assumption. The author has reached a conclusion that the immunization against cow flu cannot be routinely administered due to the cause of many fallacious reasons which lacks in validity of the premises. Similarly, the given hypothesis doesnot corroborate compelling reasons to support. All in all there is a presence of faulty analogy by which the writer has come to a conclusion.
The author first make the presumption that the main reasons that caused the death of many people was the lack of proper supply of vaccination against cow flu and the only soultion to the problem is mitigated if there was proper routine administration. These administration should be done in the areas where the diseases are detected. Here the author havent done a proper explantation to as the rise in mortality rate was due to the adverse effect of cow flu or any other reason. The area where the disease is detected could have a population consisting of higher number of adults.
In Addition to this, another assumption is reflected in the viewpoint as the author assumes that there was a possibility of people dying as a result of innoculations. Here, the writer have failed to address as to which category does this group of people fall. Are these people allergic to any of the active ingridents that is presented in the vaccine. What is the main reason as to why these people are dying after innoculation. It doesnt show if there has been an actual death after supplying the immunization. A falacy has taken place and assumption simply sounds absurd.
Moreover, anywhere in the argument there is a lack of proper flow of cohestion and correlation bolstering the validity to the result. Here the proper data as to the how these small this number means and reason the writer could have concluded the thesis. But this is not done in accordance. Does the number of people that are dying outweight the number of lives that can be save and what other measure can be done for this category. This shows a poor analogy has been created and shown as a false support claiming that since there is a small majority that are dying permition against to be routinely administered is not granted.
As a result, By taking a look at the presented argument. Simce many assumptions have been occuring with the author loosing to justify the coclusion and presenting a poor thesis with weak evidences and absurd reasoning. So This argument is not a valid argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 54
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 59
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 69
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 16 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 425 350
No. of Characters: 2020 1500
No. of Different Words: 193 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.54 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.753 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.664 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.318 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.334 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.275 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.5 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remises. Similarly, the given hypothesis doesnot corroborate compelling reasons t...
^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this administration' or 'These administrations'?
Suggestion: This administration; These administrations
...here was proper routine administration. These administration should be done in the areas where the d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... diseases are detected. Here the author havent done a proper explantation to as the ri...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...people are dying after innoculation. It doesnt show if there has been an actual death ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and assumption simply sounds absurd. Moreover, anywhere in the argument there...
^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
... the result. Here the proper data as to the how these small this number means and reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing to'?
Suggestion: losing to
...ions have been occuring with the author loosing to justify the coclusion and presenting a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, as to, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 425.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85411764706 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75069390428 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463529411765 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4106098368 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7727272727 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.70786347227 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243046755017 0.218282227539 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616886136801 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594748956834 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123814713021 0.128457276422 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567125497112 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.3799401198 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 98.500998004 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.